Literature DB >> 15952727

Optimal replication and the importance of experimental design for gel-based quantitative proteomics.

Sybille M N Hunt1, Mervyn R Thomas, Lucille T Sebastian, Susanne K Pedersen, Rebecca L Harcourt, Andrew J Sloane, Marc R Wilkins.   

Abstract

Quantitative proteomic studies, based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, are commonly used to find proteins that are differentially expressed between samples or groups of samples. These proteins are of interest as potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers, or as proteins associated with a trait. The complexity of proteomic data poses many challenges, so while experiments may reveal proteins that are differentially expressed, these are often not significant when subjected to rigorous statistical analysis. However, this can be addressed through appropriate experimental design. A good experimental design considers the impact of different sources of variation, both analytical and biological, on the statistical importance of the results. The design should address the number of samples that must be analyzed and the number of replicate gels per sample, in the context of a particular minimum difference that one is seeking to achieve. In this study, we explore the ways to improve the quality of protein expression data from 2-DE gels, and describe an approach for defining the number of samples required and the number of gels per sample. It has been developed for the simplest of situations, two groups of samples with variation at two levels: between samples and between gels. This approach will also be useful as a guide for more complex designs involving more than two groups of samples. We describe some Internet-accessible tools that can assist in the design of proteomic studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15952727     DOI: 10.1021/pr049758y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  19 in total

Review 1.  Laser capture sampling and analytical issues in proteomics.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  An insight into high-resolution mass-spectrometry data.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; H R Bergen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Informatics and statistics for analyzing 2-d gel electrophoresis images.

Authors:  Andrew W Dowsey; Jeffrey S Morris; Howard B Gutstein; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Proteomics of gliomas: initial biomarker discovery and evolution of technology.

Authors:  Juliya Kalinina; Junmin Peng; James C Ritchie; Erwin G Van Meir
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Urine collected from diapers can be used for 2-D PAGE in infants and young children.

Authors:  Mary Jayne Kennedy; Angela Griffin; Ruifeng Su; Michael Merchant; Jon Klein
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Novel approaches to detect serum biomarkers for clinical response to interferon-beta treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kaushal S Gandhi; Fiona C McKay; Eve Diefenbach; Ben Crossett; Stephen D Schibeci; Robert N Heard; Graeme J Stewart; David R Booth; Jonathan W Arthur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inferring predominant pathways in cellular models of breast cancer using limited sample proteomic profiling.

Authors:  Yogesh M Kulkarni; Vivian Suarez; David J Klinke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Genetic variation underlying protein expression in eggs of the marine mussel Mytilus edulis.

Authors:  Angel P Diz; Edward Dudley; Barry W MacDonald; Benjamin Piña; Ellen L R Kenchington; Eleftherios Zouros; David O F Skibinski
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 10.  Proteomics and systems biology for understanding diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Starkey; Ronald G Tilton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.