Literature DB >> 15951308

RAS mutation in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with distinct cytogenetic subgroups but does not influence outcome in patients younger than 60 years.

David T Bowen1, Marion E Frew, Robert Hills, Rosemary E Gale, Keith Wheatley, Michael J Groves, Stephen E Langabeer, Panagiotis D Kottaridis, Anthony V Moorman, Alan K Burnett, David C Linch.   

Abstract

The pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) involves the cooperation of mutations promoting proliferation/survival and those impairing differentiation. The RAS pathway has been implicated as a key component of the proliferative drive in AML. We have screened AML patients, predominantly younger than 60 years and treated within 2 clinical trials, for NRAS (n = 1106), KRAS (n = 739), and HRAS (n = 200) hot-spot mutations using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. NRAS mutations were confirmed in 11% of patients (126/1106) and KRAS mutations in 5% (39/739). No HRAS mutations were detected in 200 randomly selected samples. Codons most frequently mutated were N12 (43%), N13 (21%), and K12 (21%). KRAS mutations were relatively overrepresented in French-American-British (FAB) type M4 (P < .001). NRAS mutation was over-represented in the t(3;5)(q21 approximately 25;q31 approximately q35) subgroup (P < .001) and underrepresented in t(15;17)(q22;q21) (P < .001). KRAS mutation was overrepresented in inv(16)(p13q22) (P = .004). Twenty-three percent of KRAS mutations were within the inv(16) subgroup. RAS mutation and FLT3 ITD were rarely coexistent (14/768; P < .001). Median percentage of RAS mutant allele assayed by quantitative RFLP analysis was 28% (N12), 19% (N13), 25% (N61), and 21% (K12). RAS mutation did not influence clinical outcome (overall/disease-free survival, complete remission, relapse rate) either for the entire cohort or within cytogenetic risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951308     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-0867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  80 in total

Review 1.  Mechanistic and Preclinical Insights from Mouse Models of Hematologic Cancer Characterized by Hyperactive Ras.

Authors:  Anica Wandler; Kevin Shannon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Preclinical efficacy of MEK inhibition in Nras-mutant AML.

Authors:  Michael R Burgess; Eugene Hwang; Ari J Firestone; Tannie Huang; Jin Xu; Johannes Zuber; Natacha Bohin; Tiffany Wen; Scott C Kogan; Kevin M Haigis; Deepak Sampath; Scott Lowe; Kevin Shannon; Qing Li
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  RAS mutations are frequent in FAB type M4 and M5 of acute myeloid leukemia, and related to late relapse: a study of the Japanese Childhood AML Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  Hirozumi Sano; Akira Shimada; Tomohiko Taki; Chisato Murata; Myoung-Ja Park; Manabu Sotomatsu; Ken Tabuchi; Akio Tawa; Ryoji Kobayashi; Keizo Horibe; Masahiro Tsuchida; Ryoji Hanada; Ichiro Tsukimoto; Yasuhide Hayashi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Oncogenic NRAS, KRAS, and HRAS exhibit different leukemogenic potentials in mice.

Authors:  Chaitali Parikh; Ramesh Subrahmanyam; Ruibao Ren
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with a complex karyotype.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  High-throughput sequencing screen reveals novel, transforming RAS mutations in myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Tyner; Heidi Erickson; Michael W N Deininger; Stephanie G Willis; Christopher A Eide; Ross L Levine; Michael C Heinrich; Norbert Gattermann; D Gary Gilliland; Brian J Druker; Marc M Loriaux
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  K-RasG12D-induced T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemias harbor Notch1 mutations and are sensitive to gamma-secretase inhibitors.

Authors:  Thomas Kindler; Melanie G Cornejo; Claudia Scholl; Jianing Liu; Dena S Leeman; J Erika Haydu; Stefan Fröhling; Benjamin H Lee; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Genome wide molecular analysis of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Fernando P G Silva; Inês Almeida; Bruno Morolli; Geeske Brouwer-Mandema; Hans Wessels; Rolf Vossen; Harry Vrieling; Erik W A Marijt; Peter J M Valk; Hanneke C Kluin-Nelemans; Wolfgang R Sperr; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Micheline Giphart-Gassler
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Redox control of leukemia: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Mary E Irwin; Nilsa Rivera-Del Valle; Joya Chandra
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 10.  Engineering mouse models with myelodysplastic syndrome human candidate genes; how relevant are they?

Authors:  Stephanie Beurlet; Christine Chomienne; Rose Ann Padua
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.