Literature DB >> 17671181

Oncogenic NRAS, KRAS, and HRAS exhibit different leukemogenic potentials in mice.

Chaitali Parikh1, Ramesh Subrahmanyam, Ruibao Ren.   

Abstract

RAS proteins are small GTPases that play a central role in transducing signals that regulate cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. The RAS proteins interact with a common set of activators and effectors; however, they associate with different microdomains of the plasma membrane as well as other endomembranes and are capable of generating distinct signal outputs. Mutations that result in constitutive activation of RAS proteins are associated with approximately 30% of all human cancers; however, different RAS oncogenes are preferentially associated with different types of human cancer. In myeloid malignancies, NRAS mutations are more frequent than KRAS mutations, whereas HRAS mutations are rare. The mechanism underlying the different frequencies of RAS isoforms mutated in myeloid leukemia is not known. In this study, we compared the leukemogenic potential of activated NRAS, KRAS, and HRAS in the same bone marrow transduction/transplantation model system. We found that all three RAS oncogenes have the ability to induce myeloid leukemias, yet have distinct leukemogenic strengths and phenotypes. The models established here provide a system for further studying the molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies and for testing targeted therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671181      PMCID: PMC2662707          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  31 in total

1.  Differential activation of the Rac pathway by Ha-Ras and K-Ras.

Authors:  A B Walsh; D Bar-Sagi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  The dark side of Ras: regulation of apoptosis.

Authors:  Adrienne D Cox; Channing J Der
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  Ras proteins: different signals from different locations.

Authors:  John F Hancock
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Spatio-temporal segregation of Ras signals: one ship, three anchors, many harbors.

Authors:  Oliver Rocks; Anna Peyker; Philippe I H Bastiaens
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  Targeted genomic disruption of H-ras and N-ras, individually or in combination, reveals the dispensability of both loci for mouse growth and development.

Authors:  L M Esteban; C Vicario-Abejón; P Fernández-Salguero; A Fernández-Medarde; N Swaminathan; K Yienger; E Lopez; M Malumbres; R McKay; J M Ward; A Pellicer; E Santos
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Oncogenic NRAS rapidly and efficiently induces CMML- and AML-like diseases in mice.

Authors:  Chaitali Parikh; Ramesh Subrahmanyam; Ruibao Ren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Overexpression of human H-ras transgene is responsible for tumors induced by chemical carcinogens in mice.

Authors:  C Maruyama; M Tomisawa; S Wakana; H Yamazaki; H Kijima; H Suemizu; Y Ohnishi; K Urano; K Hioki; T Usui; M Nakamura; T Tsuchida; K Mitsumori; T Nomura; N Tamaoki; Y Ueyama
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies.

Authors:  Daniel B Longley; D Paul Harkin; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Mevastatin can increase toxicity in primary AMLs exposed to standard therapeutic agents, but statin efficacy is not simply associated with ras hotspot mutations or overexpression.

Authors:  D L Stirewalt; F R Appelbaum; C L Willman; R A Zager; D E Banker
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.156

10.  Somatic activation of oncogenic Kras in hematopoietic cells initiates a rapidly fatal myeloproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Benjamin S Braun; David A Tuveson; Namie Kong; Doan T Le; Scott C Kogan; Jacob Rozmus; Michelle M Le Beau; Tyler E Jacks; Kevin M Shannon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Mechanistic and Preclinical Insights from Mouse Models of Hematologic Cancer Characterized by Hyperactive Ras.

Authors:  Anica Wandler; Kevin Shannon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Palmitoylation of oncogenic NRAS is essential for leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin Cuiffo; Ruibao Ren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  RAS status in Korean patients with stage III and IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W-S Lee; J N Lee; J-H Baek; Y H Park
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Role of a non-canonical splice variant of the Helios gene in the differentiation of acute lymphoblastic leukemic T cells.

Authors:  Yinghui Li; Yanhua Liu; Can Liu; Fengyong Liu; Daolei Dou; Wenjie Zheng; Wei Liu; Feifei Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Rare codons regulate KRas oncogenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin L Lampson; Nicole L K Pershing; Joseph A Prinz; Joshua R Lacsina; William F Marzluff; Christopher V Nicchitta; David M MacAlpine; Christopher M Counter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Engineering mouse models with myelodysplastic syndrome human candidate genes; how relevant are they?

Authors:  Stephanie Beurlet; Christine Chomienne; Rose Ann Padua
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  A New View of Ras Isoforms in Cancers.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Chung-Jung Tsai; Mayukh Chakrabarti; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Tumour maintenance is mediated by eNOS.

Authors:  Kian-Huat Lim; Brooke B Ancrile; David F Kashatus; Christopher M Counter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mutation bias within oncogene families is related to proliferation-specific codon usage.

Authors:  Hannah Benisty; Marc Weber; Xavier Hernandez-Alias; Martin H Schaefer; Luis Serrano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Notch1 gene mutations target KRAS G12D-expressing CD8+ cells and contribute to their leukemogenic transformation.

Authors:  Guangyao Kong; Juan Du; Yangang Liu; Benjamin Meline; Yuan-I Chang; Erik A Ranheim; Jinyong Wang; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.