Literature DB >> 18692687

Cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with a complex karyotype.

Krzysztof Mrózek1.   

Abstract

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring three or more acquired chromosome aberrations in the absence of the prognostically favorable t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13q22)/t(6;16)(p13;q22), and t(15;17)(q22;q21) aberrations form a separate category - AML with a complex karyotype. They constitute 10% to 12% of all AML patents, with the incidence of complex karyotypes increasing with the more advanced age. Recent studies using molecular-cytogenetic techniques (spectral karyotyping [SKY], multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization [M-FISH]) and array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) considerably improved characterization of previously unidentified, partially identified, or cryptic chromosome aberrations, and allowed precise delineation of genomic imbalances. The emerging nonrandom pattern of abnormalities includes relative paucity, but not absence, of balanced rearrangements (translocations, insertions, or inversions), predominance of aberrations leading to loss of chromosome material (monosomies, deletions, and unbalanced translocations) that involve, in decreasing order, chromosome arms 5q, 17p, 7q, 18q, 16q, 17q, 12p, 20q, 18p, and 3p, and the presence of recurrent, albeit less frequent and often hidden (in marker chromosomes and unbalanced translocations) aberrations leading to overrepresentation of segments from 8q, 11q, 21q, 22q, 1p, 9p, and 13q. Several candidate genes have been identified as targets of genomic losses, for example, TP53, CTNNA1, NF1, ETV6, and TCF4, and amplifications, for example, ERG, ETS2, APP, ETS1, FLI1, MLL, DDX6, GAB2, MYC, TRIB1, and CDX2. Treatment outcomes of complex karyotype patients receiving chemotherapy are very poor. They can be improved to some extent by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in younger patients. It is hoped that better understanding of genomic alterations will result in identification of novel therapeutic targets and improved prognosis in patients with complex karyotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18692687      PMCID: PMC3640813          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  82 in total

1.  Phase I study of decitabine alone or in combination with valproic acid in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  William Blum; Rebecca B Klisovic; Bjoern Hackanson; Zhongfa Liu; Shujun Liu; Hollie Devine; Tamara Vukosavljevic; Lenguyen Huynh; Gerard Lozanski; Cheryl Kefauver; Christoph Plass; Steven M Devine; Nyla A Heerema; Anthony Murgo; Kenneth K Chan; Michael R Grever; John C Byrd; Guido Marcucci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Neurofibromatosis 1, and Not TP53, seems to be the main target of chromosome 17 deletions in de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Javier Suela; Cristina Largo; Bibiana Ferreira; Sara Alvarez; Mercedes Robledo; Anna González-Neira; Maria José Calasanz; Juan C Cigudosa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Impact of cytogenetics on outcome of matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission.

Authors:  Martin S Tallman; Gordon W Dewald; Sharavi Gandham; Brent R Logan; Armand Keating; Hillard M Lazarus; Mark R Litzow; Jayesh Mehta; Tanya Pedersen; Waleska S Pérez; Jacob M Rowe; Meir Wetzler; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Gains, losses and complex karyotypes in myeloid disorders: a light at the end of the tunnel.

Authors:  Sara Alvarez; Juan C Cigudosa
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.271

5.  RAS mutation in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with distinct cytogenetic subgroups but does not influence outcome in patients younger than 60 years.

Authors:  David T Bowen; Marion E Frew; Robert Hills; Rosemary E Gale; Keith Wheatley; Michael J Groves; Stephen E Langabeer; Panagiotis D Kottaridis; Anthony V Moorman; Alan K Burnett; David C Linch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  High expression levels of the ETS-related gene, ERG, predict adverse outcome and improve molecular risk-based classification of cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

Authors:  Guido Marcucci; Kati Maharry; Susan P Whitman; Tamara Vukosavljevic; Peter Paschka; Christian Langer; Krzysztof Mrózek; Claudia D Baldus; Andrew J Carroll; Bayard L Powell; Jonathan E Kolitz; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Evaluation of chromosome 5 aberrations in complex karyotypes of patients with myeloid disorders reveals their contribution to dicentric and tricentric chromosomes, resulting in the loss of critical 5q regions.

Authors:  Angèle Herry; Nathalie Douet-Guilbert; Frédéric Morel; Marie-Josée Le Bris; Patrick Morice; Jean François Abgrall; Christian Berthou; Marc De Braekeleer
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2007-06

8.  The prognostic significance of cytogenetic aberrations in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia. A study of the Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG).

Authors:  David R Betts; Roland A Ammann; Andreas Hirt; Heinz Hengartner; Maja Beck-Popovic; Thomas Kuhne; Luisa Nobile; Ueli Caflisch; Pierre Wacker; Felix K Niggli
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Patients with acute myeloid leukemia and RAS mutations benefit most from postremission high-dose cytarabine: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Authors:  Andreas Neubauer; Kati Maharry; Krzysztof Mrózek; Christian Thiede; Guido Marcucci; Peter Paschka; Robert J Mayer; Richard A Larson; Edison T Liu; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The homeobox gene CDX2 is aberrantly expressed in most cases of acute myeloid leukemia and promotes leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Claudia Scholl; Dimple Bansal; Konstanze Döhner; Karina Eiwen; Brian J P Huntly; Benjamin H Lee; Frank G Rücker; Richard F Schlenk; Lars Bullinger; Hartmut Döhner; D Gary Gilliland; Stefan Fröhling
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Spectral karyotyping: an unique technique for the detection of complex genomic rearrangements in leukemia.

Authors:  Bo Guo; Xiaoping Han; Zhanhe Wu; Wanming Da; Hongli Zhu
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-04

2.  Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  XPO1 Inhibition using Selinexor Synergizes with Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Targeting DNA Repair and Restoring Topoisomerase IIα to the Nucleus.

Authors:  Parvathi Ranganathan; Trinayan Kashyap; Xueyan Yu; Xiaomei Meng; Tzung-Huei Lai; Betina McNeil; Bhavana Bhatnagar; Sharon Shacham; Michael Kauffman; Adrienne M Dorrance; William Blum; Deepa Sampath; Yosef Landesman; Ramiro Garzon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  The prognostic and functional role of microRNAs in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Guido Marcucci; Krzysztof Mrózek; Michael D Radmacher; Ramiro Garzon; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Diagnostic microarrays in hematologic oncology: applications of high- and low-density arrays.

Authors:  Tatyana V Nasedkina; Natalia A Guseva; Olga A Gra; Olga N Mityaeva; Alexander V Chudinov; Alexander S Zasedatelev
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Prognostic Significance of Complex Karyotypes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Yahya Daneshbod; Leila Kohan; Vahideh Taghadosi; Olga K Weinberg; Daniel A Arber
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

7.  Prevalence and Clinical Significance of FLT3 and NPM1 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients of Assam, India.

Authors:  Jina Bhattacharyya; Sukanta Nath; Kandarpa Kumar Saikia; Renu Saxena; Sudha Sazawal; Manash Pratim Barman; Dushyant Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Mutations of e3 ubiquitin ligase cbl family members constitute a novel common pathogenic lesion in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Hideki Makishima; Heather Cazzolli; Hadrian Szpurka; Andrew Dunbar; Ramon Tiu; Jungwon Huh; Hideki Muramatsu; Christine O'Keefe; Eric Hsi; Ronald L Paquette; Seiji Kojima; Alan F List; Mikkael A Sekeres; Michael A McDevitt; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prognostic implications of chromosome 17 abnormalities in the context of monosomal karyotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and complex cytogenetics.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Hagop M Kantarjian; Vijaya R Bhatt; Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez; Jorge E Cortes; Tapan Kadia; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Lynne Abruzzo; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Farhad Ravandi; Michael Keating; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-22

10.  Expression profile and specific network features of the apoptotic machinery explain relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Ragusa; Giuseppe Avola; Rosario Angelica; Davide Barbagallo; Maria Rosa Guglielmino; Laura R Duro; Alessandra Majorana; Luisa Statello; Loredana Salito; Carla Consoli; Maria Grazia Camuglia; Cinzia Di Pietro; Giuseppe Milone; Michele Purrello
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.