Literature DB >> 15950687

Biomechanics of nonfusion implants.

Russel C Huang1, Timothy M Wright, Manohar M Panjabi, Joseph D Lipman.   

Abstract

Although spine fusion is a versatile and effective technique in the treatment of spinal disorders, increased stresses on adjacent unfused levels lead to symptomatic adjacent level degeneration in many patients. The goal of nonfusion devices in spine surgery is to ablate or unload painful structures while preserving segmental motion. The intended performance of nonfusion devices such as disc replacement, nucleus pulposus replacement, and posterior stabilization devices can be understood from the biomechanics of the functional spinal unit in health and disease and the interplay between the motion segment and the device. Implant design issues can also markedly affect performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15950687     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  17 in total

1.  Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Qingan Zhu; Eyal Itshayek; Claire F Jones; Timothy Schwab; Chadwick R Larson; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Sophie Campana; Sylvain Persohn; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Bartosz Wojewnik; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Susan M Renner; Julia Zelenakova; Braden McIntosh; Gerard Carandang; Celeste Abjornson; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Spyros Zacharatos; Andreas Zafiropoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Material properties in unconfined compression of human nucleus pulposus, injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Neil R Malhotra; Lihui Weng; Weiliam Chen; Robert L Mauck; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Juliane Zenner; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  An injectable nucleus pulposus implant restores compressive range of motion in the ovine disc.

Authors:  Neil R Malhotra; Woojin M Han; Jesse Beckstein; Jordan Cloyd; Weiliam Chen; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

9.  Skipping posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization for distant segment degenerative disease.

Authors:  Bilgehan Solmaz; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Cengiz Gomleksiz; Yaprak Ataker; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-10-03

10.  Does semi-rigid instrumentation using both flexion and extension dampening spacers truly provide an intermediate level of stabilization?

Authors:  Dilip Sengupta; Brandon Bucklen; Aditya Ingalhalikar; Aditya Muzumdar; Saif Khalil
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.