Literature DB >> 15948151

Magnetic resonance imaging of the axial skeleton enables objective measurement of tumor response on prostate cancer bone metastases.

Bertrand Tombal1, Afshin Rezazadeh, Patrick Therasse, Paul J Van Cangh, Bruno Vande Berg, Frédéric E Lecouvet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is currently no technique to image quantitatively bone metastases. Here, we assessed the value of MRI of the axial skeleton (AS-MRI) as a single step technique to quantify bone metastases and measure tumor response.
METHODS: AS-MRI was performed in 38 patients before receiving chemotherapy for metastatic HRPCa, in addition to PSA, computed tomography of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis [CT-TAP]; and Tc-99m bone scintigraphy. A second AS-MRI was performed in 20 patients who completed 6 months of chemotherapy. Evaluation of tumor response was performed using RECIST.
RESULTS: Only 11 patients (29%) had RECIST measurable metastases in soft-tissues or lymph nodes on baseline CT-TAP. AS-MRI identified a diffuse infiltration of the bone marrow in 8 patients and focal measurable metastatic lesions in 25 patients (65%), therefore, doubling the proportion of patients with measurable lesions. Transposing RECIST on AS-MRI in 20 patients who completed 6 months of treatment, allows the accurate estimation of complete response (n = 2), partial response (n = 2), stable disease (n = 5), or tumor progression (n = 11), as it is done using CT-TAP in soft tissue solid metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI of axial skeleton enables precise measurement and follow-up of bone metastases as it is for other soft-tissue metastasis. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15948151     DOI: 10.1002/pros.20280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  24 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  MRI for response assessment in metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  F E Lecouvet; A Larbi; V Pasoglou; P Omoumi; B Tombal; N Michoux; J Malghem; R Lhommel; B C Vande Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Shen; Houfu Deng; Shuang Hu; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  [Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer : Clinical data, new treatment options and therapy monitoring].

Authors:  K Miller; P Albers; R Eichenauer; G Geiges; M-O Grimm; F König; G Mickisch; D Pfister; C Schwentner; H Suttmann; S Zastrow
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  False-positive diagnosis of disease progression by magnetic resonance imaging for response assessment in prostate cancer with bone metastases: A case report and review of the pitfalls of images in the literature.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Yu; Wan-Hu Li; Ming-Huan Li; Xue Meng; L I Kong; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  [Pharmacological therapy of urogenital cancer: rational routine diagnostic imaging].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; S Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Messiou; G Cook; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline.

Authors:  Els L van Persijn van Meerten; Hans Gelderblom; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.