Literature DB >> 15944634

Arthroscopic meniscal repair using the BioStinger.

F Alan Barber1, Donald H Johnson, Jeffrey L Halbrecht.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biodegradable devices are available for all-inside meniscal repairs. One device, the BioStinger (Linvatec, Largo, FL), is made of molded poly-L-lactic acid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of and any adverse events associated with meniscus repair using this device. TYPE OF STUDY: Nonrandomized prospective cohort study.
METHODS: A prospective, consecutive, 3-center meniscal repair series using BioStingers (group 1), vertical inside-out sutures (group 2), or hybrid repairs combining BioStingers and sutures (group 3) was studied. Lysholm, Tegner, Cincinnati, and IKDC activity scores were obtained and clinical outcomes and adverse events documented.
RESULTS: There were 85 patients who underwent 89 meniscus repairs with an average 26.5 months of follow-up. There were 47 BioStinger repairs (group 1), 29 suture repairs (group 2), and 13 hybrid repairs (group 3). The tear length was statistically greater for the hybrid repair group (P < .5). There were 73 repairs associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and 12 repeat arthroscopies were performed. Meniscal healing failed in 6 knees (4 in group 1, 0 in group 2, and 2 in group 3). The meniscal healing failed in 7% of those associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Mean Tegner scores improved from 2.8 to 6.3, the final IKDC activity score was 3.2 out of 4, the mean Lysholm score improved from 51 to 88, and the mean Cincinnati score improved from 44 to 84. Two BioStinger repair cases had joint-line tenderness from device migration confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. No tenting of the skin or articular cartilage scuffing was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate for the 29 suture repairs was 100% and for the 47 BioStinger repairs was 91%. These preliminary results are consistent with other repair techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Therapeutic Prospective Cohort Study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15944634     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  5 in total

1.  Clinical results of arthroscopic all-inside lateral meniscal repair using the Meniscal Viper Repair System.

Authors:  Tetsuo Hagino; Satoshi Ochiai; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Shinya Senga; Masanori Wako; Takashi Ando; Eiichi Sato; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-23

Review 2.  [Complications with all-inside devices used in reconstructive meniscal surgery].

Authors:  P Wilmes; O Lorbach; P Brogard; R Seil
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Success of meniscal repair at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles V Toman; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziata Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John A Bergfeld; David Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Armando Vidal; Brian R Wolf; Laura J Huston; Frank E Harrell; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair in Young Patients: Comparison of All-Inside and Inside-Out Suture Techniques.

Authors:  Dong-Geun Kang; Young-Jin Park; Jae-Ha Yu; Jong-Byung Oh; Dong-Yeong Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 5.  Return-to-Play and Rehabilitation Protocols Following Isolated Meniscal Repair-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordan W Fried; Amit K Manjunath; Eoghan T Hurley; Laith M Jazrawi; Eric J Strauss; Kirk A Campbell
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.