BACKGROUND: Oxygen 15 water and nitrogen 13 ammonia are widely used for the quantitative measurement of myocardial perfusion with positron emission tomography. However, blood flow obtained with N-13 ammonia by use of the conventional 2-compartment model frequently underestimates flow by 30% to 50% compared with O-15 water. We hypothesized that this discrepancy is a result of the model configuration of N-13 ammonia and investigated changes to the mathematical model to determine whether more accurate measurements of perfusion could be obtained. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve healthy volunteers were sequentially studied with O-15 water and N-13 ammonia at rest and during maximal coronary vasodilation with adenosine. Perfusion measurements obtained with the conventional and modified models were compared with values obtained with O-15 water. The conventional N-13 ammonia model underestimated flow by 37% +/- 16% at rest and by 20% +/- 24% with stress when compared with flows obtained with O-15 water. The modified model yielded flow values closer to the line of identity than the conventional model (y = 1.07x + 0.04 vs y = 0.69x + 0.08; respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Model changes made N-13 ammonia myocardial blood flow estimates more comparable to those obtained with O-15 and may allow for better comparison of flows obtained with these two tracers in the future. Further efforts are warranted to evaluate the accuracy of flow models in human subjects.
BACKGROUND:Oxygen 15 water and nitrogen 13 ammonia are widely used for the quantitative measurement of myocardial perfusion with positron emission tomography. However, blood flow obtained with N-13 ammonia by use of the conventional 2-compartment model frequently underestimates flow by 30% to 50% compared with O-15 water. We hypothesized that this discrepancy is a result of the model configuration of N-13 ammonia and investigated changes to the mathematical model to determine whether more accurate measurements of perfusion could be obtained. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve healthy volunteers were sequentially studied with O-15 water and N-13 ammonia at rest and during maximal coronary vasodilation with adenosine. Perfusion measurements obtained with the conventional and modified models were compared with values obtained with O-15 water. The conventional N-13 ammonia model underestimated flow by 37% +/- 16% at rest and by 20% +/- 24% with stress when compared with flows obtained with O-15 water. The modified model yielded flow values closer to the line of identity than the conventional model (y = 1.07x + 0.04 vs y = 0.69x + 0.08; respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Model changes made N-13 ammonia myocardial blood flow estimates more comparable to those obtained with O-15 and may allow for better comparison of flows obtained with these two tracers in the future. Further efforts are warranted to evaluate the accuracy of flow models in human subjects.
Authors: G D Hutchins; M Schwaiger; K C Rosenspire; J Krivokapich; H Schelbert; D E Kuhl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: T R DeGrado; M W Hanson; T G Turkington; D M Delong; D A Brezinski; J P Vallée; L W Hedlund; J Zhang; F Cobb; M J Sullivan; R E Coleman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1996 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: R M de Jong; P K Blanksma; A T Willemsen; R L Anthonio; J G Meeder; J Pruim; W Vaalburg; K I Lie Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kathleen T Hickey; Robert R Sciacca; Sabahat Bokhari; Oswaldo Rodriguez; Ru-Ling Chou; Tracy L Faber; C David Cooke; Ernest V Garcia; Kenneth Nichols; Steven R Bergmann Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Y Choi; S C Huang; R A Hawkins; W G Kuhle; M Dahlbom; C K Hoh; J Czernin; M E Phelps; H R Schelbert Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 10.057