Literature DB >> 15943012

Force probe molecular dynamics simulations.

Helmut Grubmüller1.   

Abstract

Many proteins are molecular nano-machines, which perform their biological function via well-coordinated structural transitions. Often, these motions occur on much slower time scales than those accessible to conventional molecular dynamics techniques, which are limited to submicrosecond time scales by current computer technology. This is also true for ligand binding and unbinding reactions. Force probe simulations (or steered molecular dynamics) provide a powerful means to overcome this limitation, and thus to get insight into the atomistic mechanisms that underlie biological functions such as ligand binding. This chapter provides a basic introduction into this method. It further sketches a simple nonequilibrium statistical mechanics treatment that shows how to relate the results of force probe simulations to atomic force microscopy (AFM) or optical tweezer experiments. As an example, enforced unbinding simulations of streptavidin/biotin complexes are detailed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943012     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59259-912-7_23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  16 in total

1.  Anisotropic deformation response of single protein molecules.

Authors:  Hendrik Dietz; Felix Berkemeier; Morten Bertz; Matthias Rief
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  High performance computing in biology: multimillion atom simulations of nanoscale systems.

Authors:  K Y Sanbonmatsu; C-S Tung
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Molecular simulation of the binding of nerve growth factor peptide mimics to the receptor tyrosine kinase A.

Authors:  Marco Berrera; Antonino Cattaneo; Paolo Carloni
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The effect of different force applications on the protein-protein complex Barnase-Barstar.

Authors:  Jan Neumann; Kay-Eberhard Gottschalk
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Monitoring Unfolding of Titin I27 Single and Bi Domain with High-Pressure NMR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Isaline Herrada; Philippe Barthe; Marisa Vanheusden; Karine DeGuillen; Léa Mammri; Stéphane Delbecq; Felix Rico; Christian Roumestand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A Partial Calcium-Free Linker Confers Flexibility to Inner-Ear Protocadherin-15.

Authors:  Robert E Powers; Rachelle Gaudet; Marcos Sotomayor
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Elastic versus brittle mechanical responses predicted for dimeric cadherin complexes.

Authors:  Brandon L Neel; Collin R Nisler; Sanket Walujkar; Raul Araya-Secchi; Marcos Sotomayor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Collective mechanical responses of cadherin-based adhesive junctions as predicted by simulations.

Authors:  Brandon L Neel; Collin R Nisler; Sanket Walujkar; Raul Araya-Secchi; Marcos Sotomayor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  Discovery through the computational microscope.

Authors:  Eric H Lee; Jen Hsin; Marcos Sotomayor; Gemma Comellas; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Structural determinants of cadherin-23 function in hearing and deafness.

Authors:  Marcos Sotomayor; Wilhelm A Weihofen; Rachelle Gaudet; David P Corey
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.