Literature DB >> 15942740

Endorectal ultrasound-directed biopsy: a useful technique to detect local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Jeffrey J Morken1, Nancy N Baxter, Robert D Madoff, Charles O Finne.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study assesses the value of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS)-directed biopsy in detecting local recurrence of rectal cancer.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients undergoing ERUS by a single surgeon for surveillance after treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma. Lesions suggestive of local recurrence underwent ERUS-assisted core-needle biopsy (EAB) via a proctoscope after precise ERUS localization or direct ERUS-guided biopsy (EGB) via a B&K Medical probe.
RESULTS: From 1991 to 2003, 525 patients underwent 2,490 surveillance ERUS. Of these patients, 51 underwent 62 biopsy sessions: 36 EGB and 26 EAB. The mean age of patients was 67.2 years (range 38-93 years); 22 (43%) were female. Only 11 patients (22%) had undergone prior radical resection of their primary tumor. No patient experienced a complication from the biopsies despite five being anticoagulated. Of 39 patients whose cancer recurrence was documented during follow-up, 32 (82%) were diagnosed at the initial biopsy session, and in five (13%), recurrence was detected only with ERUS. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EAB and EGB in detecting recurrence was 83, 100, and 87%, respectively. In 26 patients with local recurrence, resection was performed with curative intent.
CONCLUSION: ERUS with biopsy is useful in detecting local recurrence after treatment of rectal cancer. It is safe, with a high diagnostic yield. It may be particularly useful in patients at higher risk for local recurrence (i.e., after endocavitary radiation and local excision) and may allow early detection of local recurrence, thereby permitting attempts at curative resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15942740     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0785-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  33 in total

1.  Diagnosis of recurrent rectal carcinoma by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  T Woodward; D Menke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Rate and treatment of pelvic recurrence after abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Nymann; P Jess; J Christiansen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  S Galandiuk; H S Wieand; C G Moertel; S S Cha; R J Fitzgibbons; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-01

4.  Endorectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of rectal cancer. Is it a better way to detect early local recurrence?

Authors:  F Novell; S Pascual; P Viella; M Trias
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsies of pelvic tumors.

Authors:  Marco Sailer; Dieter Bussen; Martin Fein; Stephan Freys; Sebastian E Debus; Arnulf Thiede; Karl-Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Endorectal ultrasound in the follow-up of rectal cancer patients treated by local excision or radical surgery.

Authors:  Enrique Hernandez de Anda; Suk-Hawn Lee; Charles O Finne; David A Rothenberger; Robert D Madoff; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Impact of computed tomography vs. intrarectal ultrasound on the diagnosis, resectability, and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Romano; L Esercizio; M Santangelo; G Vallone; M L Santangelo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in the assessment of intra- and transmural infiltration of tumours in the oesophagus, stomach and papilla of Vater and in the detection of extraoesophageal lesions.

Authors:  T L Tio; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.

Authors:  C Meyenberger; R A Huch Böni; P Bertschinger; G F Zala; H P Klotz; G P Krestin
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Biopsy for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Pelvic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chaoqun Han; Rong Lin; Jun Liu; Xiaohua Hou; Wei Qian; Zhen Ding
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  S A Badger; P B Devlin; P J D Neilly; R Gilliland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon; Siegbert Faiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Patrick E Young; Craig M Womeldorph; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Bjorn Brucher; Alex Stojadinovic; Itzhak Avital; Aviram Nissan; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for local recurrence of rectal cancer using CT, MRI, PET and PET-CT: A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Hongsheng Shao; Xueni Ma; Ya Gao; Jiancheng Wang; Jiarui Wu; Bo Wang; Jipin Li; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.