Literature DB >> 9189775

Endorectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of rectal cancer. Is it a better way to detect early local recurrence?

F Novell1, S Pascual, P Viella, M Trias.   

Abstract

After curative surgery for rectal cancer, diverse protocols are used in order to detect early possible local recurrence. Our objective was to compare the results obtained by the endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) with other means of assessment. From 1988 to 1995, 140 patients have undergone curative surgery for rectal cancer. The pathological and sonographic lesions were evaluated according to the TNM classification. In 21 patients a local recurrence was diagnosed: 5 of those 21 were corresponding to T 3-4, N 0 and 16 to T 2-4, N 1 stage. All 21 showed evidence of local recurrence by EUS examination, 14 by digital rectal examination, 16 by colonoscopy, 18 by computed tomography, and the carcinoembryonic antigen level was high in 13 cases. In 12 patient who were asymptomatic EUS was positive in 12, digital rectal examination in 5, computer tomography in 9, colonoscopy in 8, and the CEA was increased in 4. Re-resection was possible in 15 cases, 6 with curative approach and 9 palliative. These findings suggest that EUS in care accurate in the early detection of local recurrence compared to other means of assessment review of the. The limited number of patients studies. Main form of assessment required further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9189775     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  [Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis by contrast enhancement in MD-CT].

Authors:  C A Stückle
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Improvements in detection of rectal cancer recurrence by multiplanar reconstruction].

Authors:  C A Stückle; K F Haegele; M Jendreck; R Kickuth; O Schneider; G Hohlbach; D Liermann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Development of a cost-effective system for digital off-line analysis of transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  R Weidenhagen; T Strauss; K U Gruetzner; F W Spelsberg; H O Steitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endorectal ultrasound-directed biopsy: a useful technique to detect local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Morken; Nancy N Baxter; Robert D Madoff; Charles O Finne
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Zena Rokan; Constantinos Simillis; Christos Kontovounisios; Brendan Moran; Paris Tekkis; Gina Brown
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Systematic review of classification systems for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Z Rokan; C Simillis; C Kontovounisios; B J Moran; P Tekkis; G Brown
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

7.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ali A Siddiqui; Yomi Fayiga; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 8.  Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Patrick E Young; Craig M Womeldorph; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Bjorn Brucher; Alex Stojadinovic; Itzhak Avital; Aviram Nissan; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.207

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.