Clermont E Dionne1. 1. Research Centre of the Laval University Affiliated Hospital, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050, chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec G1S 4L8, Canada. clermont.dionne@uresp.ulaval.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Among the possible predictors of back pain outcomes that have been studied, indices of psychological distress have been found to have a high prognostic value. This study aimed at assessing the validity of a predictive model of long-term back-related functional limitations that is based on psychological distress, in a new sample of subjects. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was conducted with 860 French-speaking workers who consulted for nonspecific back pain in primary care settings of the Quebec City area. They were interviewed at baseline and again 2 years later. Psychological distress and back-related functional limitations were measured respectively with items drawn from the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Analyses were conducted by forcing the model previously developed on a sample of English-speaking health maintenance organization (HMO) members of Washington state. RESULTS: The model correctly classified 82% of subjects as to their functional limitation status at 2 years. The accuracy of the prediction was similar to that reported in the original study. CONCLUSION: The fact that this predictive model of back-related functional limitations led to similar results in a different sample of subjects and in another language brings strong support to its validity.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Among the possible predictors of back pain outcomes that have been studied, indices of psychological distress have been found to have a high prognostic value. This study aimed at assessing the validity of a predictive model of long-term back-related functional limitations that is based on psychological distress, in a new sample of subjects. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was conducted with 860 French-speaking workers who consulted for nonspecific back pain in primary care settings of the Quebec City area. They were interviewed at baseline and again 2 years later. Psychological distress and back-related functional limitations were measured respectively with items drawn from the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Analyses were conducted by forcing the model previously developed on a sample of English-speaking health maintenance organization (HMO) members of Washington state. RESULTS: The model correctly classified 82% of subjects as to their functional limitation status at 2 years. The accuracy of the prediction was similar to that reported in the original study. CONCLUSION: The fact that this predictive model of back-related functional limitations led to similar results in a different sample of subjects and in another language brings strong support to its validity.
Authors: Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Arie Nouwen; Isabelle Larocque; Eric Demers Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-07-26 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Roger Hilfiker; Lucas M Bachmann; Carolin A-M Heitz; Tobias Lorenz; Harri Joronen; Andreas Klipstein Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Helene M Langevin; Debbie Stevens-Tuttle; James R Fox; Gary J Badger; Nicole A Bouffard; Martin H Krag; Junru Wu; Sharon M Henry Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 2.362