Literature DB >> 21647820

Single-item screens identified patients with elevated levels of depressive and somatization symptoms in outpatient physical therapy.

Dennis L Hart1, Mark W Werneke, Steven Z George, Daniel Deutscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Develop efficient and accurate screening tools to identify elevated levels of depressive or somatization symptoms, which can adversely affect functional status outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of prospectively collected depressive and somatization symptoms (Symptom Checklist 90-Revised) data from 10,920 patients receiving outpatient physical therapy for a variety of neuromusculoskeletal diagnoses. Item response theory methods were used to analyze data, with particular emphasis on differential item functioning among groups of patients, and to identify potential screening items. Screening item accuracy for identifying patients with elevated symptoms was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic analyses.
RESULTS: Seven items for depressive and 10 items for somatization symptoms represented unidimensional scales. Differential item functioning was negligible for demographic and clinical variables known to affect functional status outcomes. Items providing maximum information at the 88th percentile for depressive and 77th percentile for somatization scales accurately dichotomized patients into elevated versus not elevated symptom levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of differential item functioning suggested depressive and somatization screening could be useful in routine clinical practice and allowed the development of single-item screens that accurately identified patients with elevated depressive or somatization symptoms. Item response theory-based single-item screens may facilitate evaluation and management of heterogeneous populations receiving outpatient physical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647820     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9948-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  42 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

Authors:  Tamar Pincus; A Kim Burton; Steve Vogel; Andy P Field
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Somatization Disorder.

Authors:  Donald M. Hilty; James A. Bourgeois; Celia H. Chang; Mark E. Servis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations: evidence from three large prospective studies.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Natalie Le Sage; Renée-Louise Franche; Michel Dorval; Claire Bombardier; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Towards better understanding and management of somatoform disorders.

Authors:  Aleksandar Janca; Mohan Isaac; Jane Ventouras
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02

6.  Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings.

Authors:  C E Dionne; T D Koepsell; M Von Korff; R A Deyo; W E Barlow; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Screening for symptoms of depression by physical therapists managing low back pain.

Authors:  Sonia Haggman; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2004-12

8.  Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT's unidimensionality assumption.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Michael A Kallen; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns.

Authors:  Mark Werneke; Dennis L Hart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databases.

Authors:  Ilse C S Swinkels; Dennis L Hart; Daniel Deutscher; Wil J H van den Bosch; Joost Dekker; Dinny H de Bakker; Cornelia H M van den Ende
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Results From the Validation Cohort.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Jason M Beneciuk; Trevor A Lentz; Samuel S Wu; Yunfeng Dai; Joel E Bialosky; Giorgio Zeppieri
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.751

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.