Literature DB >> 15939107

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population.

S Anandaraja1, R Narang, R Godeswar, R Laksmy, K K Talwar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is crucial in the management of ischemic heart disease patients. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is routinely calculated in laboratories world over by applying Friedewald formula for logistic reasons. We derived a new formula based on multiple regression approach.
METHODS: Lipid profiles were done on blood samples of 2008 patients. In initial 1000 patients, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was estimated by a direct method and also by Friedewald formula. By applying linear regression methods on the data of direct estimation method, a new formula was obtained and the accuracy of this new formula was validated in the next 1008 patients.
RESULTS: The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 116+/-41.5 mg/dl (3.02+/-1.08 mmol/l) measured by direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay and that calculated by Friedewald formula was 119+/-46 mg/dl (3.09+/-1.2 mmol/l) for the initial 1000 patients. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured by direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay and calculated from Friedewald formula showed good correlation (r = 0.88), however, there was minimal overestimation by the Friedewald formula. The correlation improved between direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after excluding the patients with triglycerides more than 350 mg/dl (r = 0.92). The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured by the direct assay and by new formula in the next 1008 patients was 117+/-40 mg/dl (3.04+/-1.04 mmol/l) and 113.7+/-37 mg/dl (2.96+/-0.96 mmol/l), respectively with very good correlation (r = 0.97) between them.
CONCLUSIONS: The new formula derived from multiple linear regression analysis appears to be more accurate than Friedewald formula in Indian population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15939107     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  38 in total

1.  Does friedewald formula underestimate the risk of ischemic heart disease?

Authors:  Ekta Bansal; Navpreet Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-10-12

2.  Contrast sensitivity and its determinants in people with diabetes: SN-DREAMS-II, Report No 6.

Authors:  L Gella; R Raman; S S Pal; S Ganesan; T Sharma
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Does LDL-C Estimation Using Anandaraja's Formula Give a Better Agreement with Direct LDL-C Estimation than the Friedewald's Formula?

Authors:  Shalini Gupta; Minni Verma; Kamaljit Singh
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-03-24

4.  Evaluation of four different equations for calculating LDL-C with eight different direct HDL-C assays.

Authors:  Marcelo Jose Andrade Oliveira; Hendrick E van Deventer; Lorin M Bachmann; G Russell Warnick; Katsuyuki Nakajima; Masakasu Nakamura; Ikunosuke Sakurabayashi; Mary M Kimberly; Robert D Shamburek; William J Korzun; Gary L Myers; W Greg Miller; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Calculation of LDL-Cholesterol vs. Direct Homogenous Assay.

Authors:  Mehdi Rasouli; Hossein Mokhtari
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Longitudinal lipid trends and adverse outcomes in patients with CKD: a 13-year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Tsai; Han-Chun Huang; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Chih-Wei Chung; Shih-Ni Chang; Pei-Lun Chu; Chin-Chi Kuo
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation.

Authors:  Ana Vujovic; Jelena Kotur-Stevuljevic; Slavica Spasic; Nada Bujisic; Jelena Martinovic; Milica Vujovic; Vesna Spasojevic-Kalimanovska; Aleksandra Zeljkovic; Dragoljub Pajic
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Impact of glucose and lipid markers on the correlation of calculated and enzymatic measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Qiu-Ting Dong; Ying Gao; Na-Qiong Wu; Yuan-Lin Guo; Cheng-Gang Zhu; Sha Li; Hui-Hui Liu; Ye-Xuan Cao; Hui-Wen Zhang; Xi Zhao; Geng Liu; Qian Dong; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Determining a new formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: data mining approach.

Authors:  Prabhop Dansethakul; Lalin Thapanathamchai; Sarawut Saichanma; Apilak Worachartcheewan; Phannee Pidetcha
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Assessing the Validity of Friedewald's Formula and Anandraja's Formula For Serum LDL-Cholesterol Calculation.

Authors:  P Krishnaveni; Vanitha Mn Gowda
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.