Literature DB >> 26600746

Determining a new formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: data mining approach.

Prabhop Dansethakul1, Lalin Thapanathamchai2, Sarawut Saichanma3, Apilak Worachartcheewan4, Phannee Pidetcha1.   

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a risk factor of coronary heart diseases. The estimation of LDL-C (LDL-Cal) level was performed using Friedewald's equation for triglyceride (TG) level less than 400 mg/dL. Therefore, the aim of this study is to generate a new formula for LDL-Cal and validate the correlation coefficient between LDL-Cal and LDL-C directly measured (LDL-Direct). A data set of 1786 individuals receiving annual medical check-ups from the Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Thailand in 2008 was used in this study. Lipid profiles including total cholesterol (TC), TG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL-C were determined using Roche/Hitachi modular system analyzer. The estimated LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's equation and the homogenous enzymatic method. The level of TG was divided into 6 groups (TG<200, <300, <400, <500, <600 and < 1000 mg/dL) for constructing the LDL-Cal formula. The pace regression model was used to construct the candidate formula for the LDL-Cal and determine the correlation coefficient (r) with the LDL-Direct. The candidate LDL-Cal formula was generated for 6 groups of TG levels that displayed well correlation between LDL-Cal and LDL-Direct. Interestingly, The TG level was less than 1000 mg/dL, the regression model was able to generate the equation as shown as strong r of 0.9769 with LDL-Direct. Furthermore, external data set (n = 666) with TG measurement (36-1480 mg/dL) was used to validate new formula which displayed high r of 0.971 between LDL-Cal and LDL-direct. This study explored a new formula for LDL-Cal which exhibited higher r of 0.9769 and far beyond the limitation of TG more than 1000 mg/dL and potential used for estimating LDL-C in routine clinical laboratories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Friedewald formula; LDL-C; LDL-Cal; LDL-Direct; cholesterol; data mining; pace regression

Year:  2015        PMID: 26600746      PMCID: PMC4652637          DOI: 10.17179/excli2015-162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXCLI J        ISSN: 1611-2156            Impact factor:   4.068


  12 in total

1.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

Authors:  Alice Yy Cheng; Lawrence A Leiter
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values.

Authors:  Yunqin Chen; Xiaojin Zhang; Baishen Pan; Xuejuan Jin; Haili Yao; Bin Chen; Yunzeng Zou; Junbo Ge; Haozhu Chen
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and the risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; W P Castelli; T Gordon; P M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II).

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Evaluation of methods for the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Authors:  Eleni T Bairaktari; Konstantin I Seferiadis; Moses S Elisaf
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.457

8.  Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation.

Authors:  Ana Vujovic; Jelena Kotur-Stevuljevic; Slavica Spasic; Nada Bujisic; Jelena Martinovic; Milica Vujovic; Vesna Spasojevic-Kalimanovska; Aleksandra Zeljkovic; Dragoljub Pajic
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort.

Authors:  Caio Mauricio Mendes de Cordova; Mauricio Mendes de Cordova
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.057

10.  The accuracy in using modified Friedewald equation to calculate LDL from non-fast triglyceride: a pilot study.

Authors:  Wilai Puavilai; Donpichit Laorugpongse; Chaicharn Deerochanawong; Namtip Muthapongthavorn; Pratueng Srilert
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2009-02
View more
  11 in total

1.  Calculation of LDL-Cholesterol vs. Direct Homogenous Assay.

Authors:  Mehdi Rasouli; Hossein Mokhtari
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  A New Equation for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Normolipidemia and/or Hypertriglyceridemia.

Authors:  Maureen Sampson; Clarence Ling; Qian Sun; Roa Harb; Mohmed Ashmaig; Russell Warnick; Amar Sethi; James K Fleming; James D Otvos; Jeff W Meeusen; Sarah R Delaney; Allan S Jaffe; Robert Shamburek; Marcelo Amar; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Is data mining approach a best fit formula for estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol?

Authors:  Rajlaxmi Sarangi; Jyotirmayee Bahinipati; Mona Pathak; Srikrushna Mahapatra
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-01-30

4.  Validity of a Novel Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Hideto Chaen; Shigesumi Kinchiku; Masaaki Miyata; Shoko Kajiya; Hitoshi Uenomachi; Toshinori Yuasa; Kunitsugu Takasaki; Mitsuru Ohishi
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 4.928

5.  Correlation of Friedewald's calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Nanda; M Bharathy; Asha Dinakaran; Lopamudra Ray; K Ravichandran
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Friedewald's equation for calculating LDL-cholesterol: Is it the time to say "Goodbye" and adopt direct LDL cholesterol methods?

Authors:  Sikandar Hayat Khan; Najmusaqib Khan Niazi; Farah Sobia; Nadeem Fazal; Syed Mohsin Manzoor; Ahmed Nadeem
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Comparison of three equations for estimating low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in the rural northeastern region of Thailand.

Authors:  Sirawich Sonsok; Pongdech Sarakarn; Pattara Sanchaisuriya
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Metabolically healthy overweight adolescents: definition and components.

Authors:  António Videira-Silva; Silvia Freira; Helena Fonseca
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-12-31

9.  L-Lysine Ameliorates Diabetic Nephropathy in Rats with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Faezeh Jozi; Nejat Kheiripour; Maryam Akhavan Taheri; Abolfazl Ardjmand; Gholamreza Ghavipanjeh; Zahra Nasehi; Mohammad Esmaeil Shahaboddin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.246

10.  Flexibilization of Fasting for Laboratory Determination of the Lipid Profile in Brazil: Science or Convenience?

Authors:  Caio Maurício Mendes de Cordova; Caroline Galgowski
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.