Literature DB >> 29380428

Impact of glucose and lipid markers on the correlation of calculated and enzymatic measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Qiu-Ting Dong1, Ying Gao1, Na-Qiong Wu1, Yuan-Lin Guo1, Cheng-Gang Zhu1, Sha Li1, Hui-Hui Liu1, Ye-Xuan Cao1, Hui-Wen Zhang1, Xi Zhao1, Geng Liu1, Qian Dong1, Jian-Jun Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is widely estimated by Friedewald equation (FE) and Enzymatic test (ET), which are affected by several factors. The aim of this study was to observe the impact of diabetic lipid and glucose patterns on the correlation between FE LDL-C (F-LDL) and ET LDL-C (E-LDL) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 8155 CAD patients were consecutively enrolled and their lipid profiles were measured. The impacts of triglyceride (TG), glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) on the correlation of F-LDL and E-LDL were examined. The difference value (DV) between F-LDL and E-LDL was compared using ANOVA test. The CAD patients with DM were elder and had higher body mass index, plasma TG compared with those without DM (P < .05 separately). In the whole population, F-LDL was lower than E-LDL but showed a high correlation with E-LDL (r = .970, P = .000). Moreover, as the TG concentrations increased, the DV increased accordingly but the correlation between F-LDL and E-LDL decreased (P < .01). The similar trend was also found in both DM and non-DM patients comparing with different TG groups. However, in patients with DM, there was no significant difference of DV in different HbA1c groups or HDL-C concentrations (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: Although F-LDL might underestimate the value of LDL-C, the correlation between F-LDL and E-LDL was clinically acceptable (r = .97), suggesting the LDL-C values measured by two methods were similarly reliable in CAD patients with or without DM.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Friedewald equation; LDL-C; diabetes mellitus; enzymatic test; triglycerides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380428      PMCID: PMC6816917          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  30 in total

1.  The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations.

Authors:  H Scharnagl; M Nauck; H Wieland; W März
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Nonfasting lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins in individuals with and without diabetes: 58 434 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study.

Authors:  Anne Langsted; Børge G Nordestgaard
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values.

Authors:  Yunqin Chen; Xiaojin Zhang; Baishen Pan; Xuejuan Jin; Haili Yao; Bin Chen; Yunzeng Zou; Junbo Ge; Haozhu Chen
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Comparison of friedewald formula and modified friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation.

Authors:  Muhammad Anwar; Dilshad Ahmed Khan; Farooq Ahmad Khan
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.711

5.  Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials.

Authors:  Jordan Fulcher; Rachel O'Connell; Merryn Voysey; Jonathan Emberson; Lisa Blackwell; Borislava Mihaylova; John Simes; Rory Collins; Adrienne Kirby; Helen Colhoun; Eugene Braunwald; John La Rosa; T R Pedersen; Andrew Tonkin; Barry Davis; Peter Sleight; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Colin Baigent; Anthony Keech
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Friedewald equation underestimates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at low concentrations in young people with and without Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  L Sibal; R D G Neely; A Jones; P D Home
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Influence of food intake, age, gender, HbA1c, and BMI levels on plasma cholesterol in 29,979 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes--reference data from the German diabetes documentation and quality management system (DPV).

Authors:  K Otfried Schwab; Jürgen Doerfer; Andrea Naeke; Tilman Rohrer; Dagobert Wiemann; Wolfgang Marg; Sabine E Hofer; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation.

Authors:  Ana Vujovic; Jelena Kotur-Stevuljevic; Slavica Spasic; Nada Bujisic; Jelena Martinovic; Milica Vujovic; Vesna Spasojevic-Kalimanovska; Aleksandra Zeljkovic; Dragoljub Pajic
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort.

Authors:  Caio Mauricio Mendes de Cordova; Mauricio Mendes de Cordova
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.057

10.  Increased prevalence of coronary ectasia in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  K Sudhir; T A Ports; T M Amidon; J J Goldberger; V Bhushan; J P Kane; P Yock; M J Malloy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.