Literature DB >> 18816319

BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience.

Alexis D Bakos1, Sadie P Hutson, Jennifer T Loud, June A Peters, Ruthann M Giusti, Mark H Greene.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When women from families with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation test negative for the family mutation, it is assumed that they will transition their personal cancer risk perception from high to average risk. However, there are scant data regarding the experience of mutation-negative women after genetic testing disclosure, particularly related to the shift of risk perception from assumed mutation-positive to actual mutation-negative. This study was designed to explore cancer risk perception and the experience of being a mutation-negative woman within a known BRCA1/2 mutation-positive family.
METHODS: We employed a qualitative descriptive design and convened a sample of 13 women who contributed in-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews (audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim) and performed qualitative content analysis with NVivo 2.0 software.
RESULTS: Six major content areas emerged from interview data: (i) rationale for initial involvement in the breast imaging study, (ii) rationale for continued participation, (iii) experience of living in a multiple-case family, (iv) risk perception: the personal meaning of mutation-negative status, (v) opinions regarding cancer aetiology and (vi) communication patterns between mutation-negative and mutation-positive family members.
CONCLUSIONS: Living in a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family is a complex experience that affects cognitive, emotional and social functioning. Our findings indicate that mutation-negative women may have unmet psychosocial needs that must be addressed by health-care professionals, particularly in the primary-care setting following genetic disclosure of a potentially reassuring result regarding their lack of the very high cancer risks associated with BRCA1/2 mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816319      PMCID: PMC2803025          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00494.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  28 in total

Review 1.  Whatever happened to qualitative description?

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Experiencing transitions: an emerging middle-range theory.

Authors:  A I Meleis; L M Sawyer; E O Im; D K Hilfinger Messias; K Schumacher
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.824

3.  Breast-cancer risk in BRCA-mutation-negative women from BRCA-mutation-positive families.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra van Dijk; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Aad Tibben; Christi J van Asperen; Wilma Otten
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Harvey A Risch; John R McLaughlin; David E C Cole; Barry Rosen; Linda Bradley; Isabel Fan; James Tang; Song Li; Shiyu Zhang; Patricia A Shaw; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; C Hughes; R T Croyle; D Main; C Durham; C Snyder; A Bonney; J F Lynch; S A Narod; H T Lynch
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 7.  Transition: a literature review.

Authors:  Debbie Kralik; Kate Visentin; Antonia van Loon
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Patient responses to the disclosure of BRCA mutation tests in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Carrie Snyder; Jane F Lynch; Peggy Karatoprakli; Abdon Trowonou; Kelly Metcalfe; Steven A Narod; Gordon Gong
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2006-03

9.  The impact of a brief problem-solving training intervention for relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Lerman; J Audrain; D Cella; B Rimer; M Stefanek; J Garber; T H Lin; V Vogel
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1998

Review 10.  Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Janice L Berliner; Angela Musial Fay
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.717

View more
  22 in total

1.  French women's breast self-examination practices with time after undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing.

Authors:  C Maheu; T Apostolidis; A Petri-Cal; E Mouret-Fourme; M Gauthier-Villars; C Lasset; P Berthet; J-P Fricker; O Caron; E Luporsi; L Gladieff; C Noguès; C Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Supporting participation in clinical research: decision aids for trial recruitment?

Authors:  Vikki Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Margaret Charles; Melanie A Price
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-28

9.  Factors Influencing Clinical Follow-Up for Individuals with a Personal History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer and Previous Uninformative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah E Chadwell; Hua He; Sara Knapke; Jaime Lewis; Rebecca Sisson; Jennifer Hopper
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Management of genetic syndromes predisposing to gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Susan Miesfeldt; Amanda Lamb; Christine Duarte
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.