PURPOSE: Among gynecologic malignancies, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality due to rapid peritoneal dissemination. Treatment failure particularly arises from failure to eliminate disseminated cells. Our aim was to develop peptidic radioligands targeting tumour cell-associated urokinase receptor (uPAR, CD87) for alpha-emitter therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: DOTA-conjugated, uPAR-directed ligands were synthesised on solid-phase. Binding of peptides to human cells expressing uPAR was assayed by flow cytofluorometry or, in case of (213)Bi-labelled peptides, by measuring cell-bound radioactivity. Bio-distribution of the (213)Bi-labelled peptide P-P4D was analysed in nude mice 28 days after intraperitoneal inoculation of OV-MZ-6 ovarian cancer cells in the absence or presence of the plasma expander gelofusine. RESULTS: uPAR-selective ligands were developed based on published high-affinity uPAR-binding peptides. For preparation of N-terminally cross-linked divalent ligands, a novel solid-phase procedure was developed. Specific binding of (213)Bi-labelled peptides to monocytoid U937 and OV-MZ-6 cells was demonstrated using the natural ligand of uPAR, pro-uPA, or a soluble form of uPAR, suPAR, as competitors. The pseudo-symmetrical covalent dimer (213)Bi-P-P4D displayed superior binding to OV-MZ-6 cells in vitro. Accumulation of (213)Bi-P-P4D in tumour tissue was demonstrated by bio-distribution analysis in nude mice bearing intraperitoneal OV-MZ-6-derived tumours. Gelofusine reduced kidney uptake of (213)Bi-P-P4D by half. CONCLUSION: Ovarian cancer cells overexpressing uPAR were specifically targeted in vitro and in vivo by (213)Bi-P-P4D. Kidney uptake of (213)Bi-P-P4D was distinctly reduced using gelofusine. Thus, this radiopeptide may represent a promising option for therapy for disseminated ovarian cancer.
PURPOSE: Among gynecologic malignancies, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality due to rapid peritoneal dissemination. Treatment failure particularly arises from failure to eliminate disseminated cells. Our aim was to develop peptidic radioligands targeting tumour cell-associated urokinase receptor (uPAR, CD87) for alpha-emitter therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS:DOTA-conjugated, uPAR-directed ligands were synthesised on solid-phase. Binding of peptides to human cells expressing uPAR was assayed by flow cytofluorometry or, in case of (213)Bi-labelled peptides, by measuring cell-bound radioactivity. Bio-distribution of the (213)Bi-labelled peptide P-P4D was analysed in nude mice 28 days after intraperitoneal inoculation of OV-MZ-6 ovarian cancer cells in the absence or presence of the plasma expander gelofusine. RESULTS:uPAR-selective ligands were developed based on published high-affinity uPAR-binding peptides. For preparation of N-terminally cross-linked divalent ligands, a novel solid-phase procedure was developed. Specific binding of (213)Bi-labelled peptides to monocytoid U937 and OV-MZ-6 cells was demonstrated using the natural ligand of uPAR, pro-uPA, or a soluble form of uPAR, suPAR, as competitors. The pseudo-symmetrical covalent dimer (213)Bi-P-P4D displayed superior binding to OV-MZ-6 cells in vitro. Accumulation of (213)Bi-P-P4D in tumour tissue was demonstrated by bio-distribution analysis in nude mice bearing intraperitoneal OV-MZ-6-derived tumours. Gelofusine reduced kidney uptake of (213)Bi-P-P4D by half. CONCLUSION:Ovarian cancer cells overexpressing uPAR were specifically targeted in vitro and in vivo by (213)Bi-P-P4D. Kidney uptake of (213)Bi-P-P4D was distinctly reduced using gelofusine. Thus, this radiopeptide may represent a promising option for therapy for disseminated ovarian cancer.
Authors: Stefan Kneifel; Dominik Cordier; Stephan Good; Mihai C S Ionescu; Anthony Ghaffari; Silvia Hofer; Martin Kretzschmar; Markus Tolnay; Christos Apostolidis; Beatrice Waser; Marlene Arnold; Jan Mueller-Brand; Helmut R Maecke; Jean Claude Reubi; Adrian Merlo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jasti S Rao; Christopher Gondi; Chandramu Chetty; Subramanyam Chittivelu; Pushpa A Joseph; Sajani S Lakka Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jaspreet Singh Jaggi; Surya V Seshan; Michael R McDevitt; George Sgouros; Elizabeth Hyjek; David A Scheinberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yunpeng Ye; Walter Akers; Baogang Xu; Sharon Bloch; Charles Odonkor; Samuel Achilefu Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Hilary A Kenny; Payton Leonhardt; Andras Ladanyi; S Diane Yamada; Anthony Montag; Hae Kyung Im; Sujatha Jagadeeswaran; David E Shaw; Andrew P Mazar; Ernst Lengyel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Benjamin B Kasten; Xiaowei Ma; Kai Cheng; Lihong Bu; Winston S Slocumb; Thomas R Hayes; Steven Trabue; Zhen Cheng; Paul D Benny Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Morten Persson; Masood Hosseini; Jacob Madsen; Thomas J D Jørgensen; Knud J Jensen; Andreas Kjaer; Michael Ploug Journal: Theranostics Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Marleen Melis; Magda Bijster; Monique de Visser; Mark W Konijnenberg; Jan de Swart; Edgar J Rolleman; Otto C Boerman; Eric P Krenning; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 9.236