PURPOSE: Affibody molecules are low molecular weight proteins (7 kDa), which can be selected to bind to tumour-associated target proteins with subnanomolar affinity. Because of rapid tumour localisation and clearance from nonspecific compartments, Affibody molecules are promising tracers for molecular imaging. Earlier, (99m)Tc-labelled Affibody molecules demonstrated specific targeting of tumour xenografts. However, the biodistribution was suboptimal either because of hepatobiliary excretion or high renal uptake of the radioactivity. The goal of this study was to optimise the biodistribution of Affibody molecules by chelator engineering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anti-HER2 Z(HER2:342) Affibody molecules, carrying the mercaptoacetyl-glutamyl-seryl-glutamyl (maESE), mercaptoacetyl-glutamyl-glutamyl-seryl (maEES) and mercaptoacetyl-seryl-glutamyl-glutamyl (maSEE) chelators, were prepared by peptide synthesis and labelled with (99m)Tc. The tumour-targeting capacity of these conjugates was compared with each other and with the best previously available conjugate, (99m)Tc-maEEE-Z(HER2:342,) in nude mice bearing SKOV-3 xenografts. The tumour-targeting capacity of the most promising conjugate, (99m)Tc-maESE-Z(HER2:342,) was compared with radioiodinated Z(HER2:342). RESULTS: All novel conjugates demonstrated successful tumour targeting and a low degree of hepatobiliary excretion. The renal uptakes of serine-containing conjugates, 33 +/- 5, 68 +/- 21 and 71 +/- 10%IA/g, for(99m)Tc-maESE-Z(HER2:342), (99m)Tc-maEES-Z(HER2:342) and (99m)Tc-maSEE-Z(HER2:342), respectively, were significantly reduced in comparison with (99m)Tc-maEEE-Z(HER2:342) (102 +/- 13%IA/g). For (99m)Tc-maESE-Z(HER2:342), a tumour uptake of 9.6 +/- 1.8%IA/g and a tumour-to-blood ratio of 58 +/- 6 were reached at 4 h p.i. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of serine and glutamic acid residues in the chelator sequence confers increased renal excretion and relatively low renal uptake of (99m)Tc-labelled Affibody molecules. In combination with preserved targeting capacity, this improved imaging of targets in abdominal area.
PURPOSE: Affibody molecules are low molecular weight proteins (7 kDa), which can be selected to bind to tumour-associated target proteins with subnanomolar affinity. Because of rapid tumour localisation and clearance from nonspecific compartments, Affibody molecules are promising tracers for molecular imaging. Earlier, (99m)Tc-labelled Affibody molecules demonstrated specific targeting of tumour xenografts. However, the biodistribution was suboptimal either because of hepatobiliary excretion or high renal uptake of the radioactivity. The goal of this study was to optimise the biodistribution of Affibody molecules by chelator engineering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anti-HER2 Z(HER2:342) Affibody molecules, carrying the mercaptoacetyl-glutamyl-seryl-glutamyl (maESE), mercaptoacetyl-glutamyl-glutamyl-seryl (maEES) and mercaptoacetyl-seryl-glutamyl-glutamyl (maSEE) chelators, were prepared by peptide synthesis and labelled with (99m)Tc. The tumour-targeting capacity of these conjugates was compared with each other and with the best previously available conjugate, (99m)Tc-maEEE-Z(HER2:342,) in nude mice bearing SKOV-3 xenografts. The tumour-targeting capacity of the most promising conjugate, (99m)Tc-maESE-Z(HER2:342,) was compared with radioiodinated Z(HER2:342). RESULTS: All novel conjugates demonstrated successful tumour targeting and a low degree of hepatobiliary excretion. The renal uptakes of serine-containing conjugates, 33 +/- 5, 68 +/- 21 and 71 +/- 10%IA/g, for(99m)Tc-maESE-Z(HER2:342), (99m)Tc-maEES-Z(HER2:342) and (99m)Tc-maSEE-Z(HER2:342), respectively, were significantly reduced in comparison with (99m)Tc-maEEE-Z(HER2:342) (102 +/- 13%IA/g). For (99m)Tc-maESE-Z(HER2:342), a tumour uptake of 9.6 +/- 1.8%IA/g and a tumour-to-blood ratio of 58 +/- 6 were reached at 4 h p.i. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of serine and glutamic acid residues in the chelator sequence confers increased renal excretion and relatively low renal uptake of (99m)Tc-labelled Affibody molecules. In combination with preserved targeting capacity, this improved imaging of targets in abdominal area.
Authors: Anna Orlova; Thuy Tran; Charles Widström; Torun Engfeldt; Amelie Eriksson Karlström; Vladimir Tolmachev Journal: Int J Mol Med Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.101
Authors: Anna Orlova; Vladimir Tolmachev; Rikard Pehrson; Malin Lindborg; Thuy Tran; Mattias Sandström; Fredrik Y Nilsson; Anders Wennborg; Lars Abrahmsén; Joachim Feldwisch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Vladimir Tolmachev; Anna Orlova; Fredrik Y Nilsson; Joachim Feldwisch; Anders Wennborg; Lars Abrahmsén Journal: Expert Opin Biol Ther Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Anna Orlova; Mikaela Magnusson; Tove L J Eriksson; Martin Nilsson; Barbro Larsson; Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg; Charles Widström; Jörgen Carlsson; Vladimir Tolmachev; Stefan Ståhl; Fredrik Y Nilsson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M Friedman; E Nordberg; I Höidén-Guthenberg; H Brismar; G P Adams; F Y Nilsson; J Carlsson; S Ståhl Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: David Bushnell; Yusuf Menda; Thomas O'Dorisio; Mark Madsen; Sara Miller; Thomas Carlisle; Shayne Squires; Daniel Kahn; Wayne Walkner; Mary Connolly; Sue O'Dorisio; Mark Karwal; James Ponto; Hakim Bouterfa Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Gang Ren; Jack M Webster; Zhe Liu; Rong Zhang; Zheng Miao; Hongguang Liu; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Faisal A Syud; Zhen Cheng Journal: Amino Acids Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 3.520
Authors: Hanna Lindberg; Camilla Hofström; Mohamed Altai; Hadis Honorvar; Helena Wållberg; Anna Orlova; Stefan Ståhl; Torbjörn Gräslund; Vladimir Tolmachev Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2012-01-17
Authors: Zhen Cheng; Omayra Padilla De Jesus; Daniel J Kramer; Abhijit De; Jack M Webster; Olivier Gheysens; Jelena Levi; Mohammad Namavari; Sen Wang; Jinha Mark Park; Rong Zhang; Hongguang Liu; Brian Lee; Faisal A Syud; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Marek Pruszynski; Eftychia Koumarianou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Hilde Revets; Nick Devoogdt; Tony Lahoutte; H Kim Lyerly; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marek Pruszynski; Eftychia Koumarianou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Hilde Revets; Nick Devoogdt; Tony Lahoutte; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Alexander L Antaris; Hao Chen; Kai Cheng; Yao Sun; Guosong Hong; Chunrong Qu; Shuo Diao; Zixin Deng; Xianming Hu; Bo Zhang; Xiaodong Zhang; Omar K Yaghi; Zita R Alamparambil; Xuechuan Hong; Zhen Cheng; Hongjie Dai Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 43.841