Literature DB >> 15937136

Patterns of synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster genes with sex-biased expression.

Tina M Hambuch1, John Parsch.   

Abstract

The nonrandom use of synonymous codons (codon bias) is a well-established phenomenon in Drosophila. Recent reports suggest that levels of codon bias differ among genes that are differentially expressed between the sexes, with male-expressed genes showing less codon bias than female-expressed genes. To examine the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and level of codon bias on a genomic scale, we surveyed synonymous codon usage in 7276 D. melanogaster genes that were classified as male-, female-, or non-sex-biased in their expression in microarray experiments. We found that male-biased genes have significantly less codon bias than both female- and non-sex-biased genes. This pattern holds for both germline and somatically expressed genes. Furthermore, we find a significantly negative correlation between level of codon bias and degree of sex-biased expression for male-biased genes. In contrast, female-biased genes do not differ from non-sex-biased genes in their level of codon bias and show a significantly positive correlation between codon bias and degree of sex-biased expression. These observations cannot be explained by differences in chromosomal distribution, mutational processes, recombinational environment, gene length, or absolute expression level among genes of the different expression classes. We propose that the observed codon bias differences result from differences in selection at synonymous and/or linked nonsynonymous sites between genes with male- and female-biased expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937136      PMCID: PMC1449783          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.038109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  57 in total

1.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila.

Authors:  J R Powell; E N Moriyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity.

Authors:  M Gouy; C Gautier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Positive selection and the molecular evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila.

Authors:  S C Tsaur; C I Wu
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R M Kliman; J Hey
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  R M Kliman; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.

Authors:  H Grosjean; W Fiers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  32 in total

1.  Rapid Evolution of Ovarian-Biased Genes in the Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti).

Authors:  Carrie A Whittle; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolutionary genomics of Colias Phosphoglucose Isomerase (PGI) introns.

Authors:  Baiqing Wang; J Mason Depasse; Ward B Watt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Positive and purifying selection on the Drosophila Y chromosome.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Leonardo B Koerich; Antonio Bernardo Carvalho; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Codon usage vis-a-vis start and stop codon context analysis of three dicot species.

Authors:  Prosenjit Paul; Arup Kumar Malakar; Supriyo Chakraborty
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Widespread adaptive evolution of Drosophila genes with sex-biased expression.

Authors:  Matthias Pröschel; Zhi Zhang; John Parsch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Accelerated evolution of morph-biased genes in pea aphids.

Authors:  Swapna R Purandare; Ryan D Bickel; Julie Jaquiery; Claude Rispe; Jennifer A Brisson
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Experimentally increased codon bias in the Drosophila Adh gene leads to an increase in larval, but not adult, alcohol dehydrogenase activity.

Authors:  Winfried Hense; Nathan Anderson; Stephan Hutter; Wolfgang Stephan; John Parsch; David B Carlini
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A new test for selection applied to codon usage in Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Aelén Mabillé; Jennifer R Peters-Hall; Josep M Comeron; Richard M Kliman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.