Literature DB >> 15932942

Variation in efficiency of DNA mismatch repair at different sites in the yeast genome.

Joshua D Hawk1, Lela Stefanovic, Jayne C Boyer, Thomas D Petes, Rosann A Farber.   

Abstract

Evolutionary studies have suggested that mutation rates vary significantly at different positions in the eukaryotic genome. The mechanism that is responsible for this context-dependence of mutation rates is not understood. We demonstrate experimentally that frameshift mutation rates in yeast microsatellites depend on the genomic context and that this variation primarily reflects the context-dependence of the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair. We measured the stability of a 16.5-repeat polyGT tract by using a reporter gene (URA3-GT) in which the microsatellite was inserted in-frame into the yeast URA3 gene. We constructed 10 isogenic yeast strains with the reporter gene at different locations in the genome. Rates of frameshift mutations that abolished the correct reading frame of this gene were determined by fluctuation analysis. A 16-fold difference was found among these strains. We made mismatch-repair-deficient (msh2) derivatives of six of the strains. Mutation rates were elevated for all of these strains, but the differences in rates among the strains were substantially reduced. The simplest interpretation of this result is that the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair varies in different regions of the genome, perhaps reflecting some aspect of chromosome structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15932942      PMCID: PMC1150857          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0503415102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Destabilization of simple repetitive DNA sequences by transcription in yeast.

Authors:  M Wierdl; C N Greene; A Datta; S Jinks-Robertson; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Repair of base-base mismatches in simian and human cells.

Authors:  T C Brown; J Jiricny
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.166

Review 3.  The chromosome ends of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E J Louis
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Nucleic acid composition, codon usage, and the rate of synonymous substitution in protein-coding genes.

Authors:  A Ticher; D Graur
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. This paper is dedicated to Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky on the occasion of his 66th birthday.

Authors:  G Streisinger; Y Okada; J Emrich; J Newton; A Tsugita; E Terzaghi; M Inouye
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1966

6.  The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.

Authors:  K H Wolfe; P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  D Tautz; M Renz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions.

Authors:  R A Reenan; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Association of increased spontaneous mutation rates with high levels of transcription in yeast.

Authors:  A Datta; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  54 in total

1.  Genome-wide model for the normal eukaryotic DNA replication fork.

Authors:  Andres A Larrea; Scott A Lujan; Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Michael A Resnick; Dmitry A Gordenin; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  The polymerase eta translesion synthesis DNA polymerase acts independently of the mismatch repair system to limit mutagenesis caused by 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in yeast.

Authors:  Sarah V Mudrak; Caroline Welz-Voegele; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Evidence that nucleosomes inhibit mismatch repair in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Feng Li; Lei Tian; Liya Gu; Guo-Min Li
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Accumulation of recessive lethal mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mlh1 mismatch repair mutants is not associated with gross chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Julie Akiko Heck; David Gresham; David Botstein; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  New insights and challenges in mismatch repair: getting over the chromatin hurdle.

Authors:  Guo-Min Li
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-24

7.  The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous Mutations in the GC-Rich Multichromosome Genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia.

Authors:  Marcus M Dillon; Way Sung; Michael Lynch; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mutation hot spots in yeast caused by long-range clustering of homopolymeric sequences.

Authors:  Xin Ma; Maria V Rogacheva; K T Nishant; Sarah Zanders; Carlos D Bustamante; Eric Alani
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast.

Authors:  Yuan O Zhu; Mark L Siegal; David W Hall; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gregory I Lang; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.