BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers arising in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) can be largely prevented by polyp surveillance and prophylactic colectomy. As a result, duodenal adenocarcinoma has become a leading cause of death in patients with FAP. Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibition is effective against colorectal polyposis in FAP, but is less effective in treating duodenal polyps. We compared the expression of COX-2 in duodenal and colorectal adenomas from patients with FAP and from patients with sporadic neoplasms and correlated expression to a COX-2 promoter polymorphism (-765G/-->C) that is reported to influence COX-2 expression. METHODS: The study population included 36 FAP patients with colonic adenomas, 22 FAP patients with duodenal adenomas, 22 patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas, and 17 patients with sporadic duodenal adenocarcinoma. Neoplastic and corresponding normal tissue COX-2 expressions were determined using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. The prevalence and ethnic distribution of a polymorphism in the COX-2 promoter that influences COX-2 expression (-765G --> C) were determined in DNA from 274 individuals by real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Among patients with FAP, histologically normal duodenal mucosa showed higher COX-2 expression than normal colonic mucosa (P < 0.02), and duodenal adenomas had higher COX-2 expression than colonic adenomas (P </= 0.01). In addition, the normal duodenum of patients with FAP showed higher COX-2 expression than the normal duodenal mucosa of patients with sporadic adenomas (P < 0.05). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in the normal-appearing (P < 0.01) mucosa of patients with FAP carrying the -765GG genotype compared with those carrying the -765GC or -765CC genotypes. The -765C genotype was more common in African Americans than in Caucasians (52% versus 33%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: High COX-2 expression in the normal and adenomatous duodenal mucosa of patients with FAP may explain the poorer response of these neoplasms to chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors.
BACKGROUND:Colorectal cancers arising in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) can be largely prevented by polyp surveillance and prophylactic colectomy. As a result, duodenal adenocarcinoma has become a leading cause of death in patients with FAP. Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibition is effective against colorectal polyposis in FAP, but is less effective in treating duodenal polyps. We compared the expression of COX-2 in duodenal and colorectal adenomas from patients with FAP and from patients with sporadic neoplasms and correlated expression to a COX-2 promoter polymorphism (-765G/-->C) that is reported to influence COX-2 expression. METHODS: The study population included 36 FAPpatients with colonic adenomas, 22 FAPpatients with duodenal adenomas, 22 patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas, and 17 patients with sporadic duodenal adenocarcinoma. Neoplastic and corresponding normal tissue COX-2 expressions were determined using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. The prevalence and ethnic distribution of a polymorphism in the COX-2 promoter that influences COX-2 expression (-765G --> C) were determined in DNA from 274 individuals by real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Among patients with FAP, histologically normal duodenal mucosa showed higher COX-2 expression than normal colonic mucosa (P < 0.02), and duodenal adenomas had higher COX-2 expression than colonic adenomas (P </= 0.01). In addition, the normal duodenum of patients with FAP showed higher COX-2 expression than the normal duodenal mucosa of patients with sporadic adenomas (P < 0.05). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in the normal-appearing (P < 0.01) mucosa of patients with FAP carrying the -765GG genotype compared with those carrying the -765GC or -765CC genotypes. The -765C genotype was more common in African Americans than in Caucasians (52% versus 33%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: High COX-2 expression in the normal and adenomatous duodenal mucosa of patients with FAP may explain the poorer response of these neoplasms to chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors.
Authors: Noriyuki Omura; Margaret Griffith; Audrey Vincent; Ang Li; Seung-Mo Hong; Kimberly Walter; Michael Borges; Michael Goggins Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Danielle Langeveld; W Arnout van Hattem; Wendy W J de Leng; Folkert H Morsink; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Francis M Giardiello; G Johan A Offerhaus; Lodewijk A A Brosens Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Willem Arnout van Hattem; Danielle Langeveld; Wendy W J de Leng; Folkert H Morsink; Paul J van Diest; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Francis M Giardiello; G Johan A Offerhaus; Lodewijk A A Brosens Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Kari Almendingen; Laila N Larsen; Olav Fausa; Jorunn Bratlie; Arne T Høstmark; Lars Aabakken Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.375