Literature DB >> 15925146

Peripheral gustatory processing of sweet stimuli by golden hamsters.

Marion E Frank1, Bradley K Formaker, Thomas P Hettinger.   

Abstract

Behaviors and taste-nerve responses to bitter stimuli are linked to compounds that bind T2 receptors expressed in one subset of taste-bud receptor cells (TRCs); and behavioral and neural responses to sweet stimuli are linked to chemical compounds that bind a T1 receptor expressed in a different TRC subset. Neural and behavioral responses to bitter-sweet mixtures, however, complicate the ostensible bitter and sweet labeled lines. In the golden hamster, Mesocricetus auratus, quinine hydrochloride, the bitter prototype, suppresses chorda tympani (CT) nerve responses to the sweet prototype: sucrose. This bitter-sweet inhibition was tested with concentration series of sucrose and dulcin, a hydrophobic synthetic sweetener that hamsters behaviorally cross-generalize with sucrose. Dulcin, sucrose and other sweeteners activate one subset of CT fibers: S neurons; whereas, quinine activates a separate subset of CT fibers: E neurons. Whole-nerve and S-neuron CT responses to a sweetener concentration series, mixed with 0, 1, 3 and 10 mM quinine, were measured for 0-2.5 s transient and/or 2.6-10 s steady-state response periods. Ten-sec total single-fiber records, aligned at response onset, were averaged for 100 ms bins to identify response oscillations. Quinine inhibition of dulcin and sucrose responses was identical. Each log molar increment in quinine resulted in equivalent declines in response to either sweetener. Furthermore, sucrose response decrements paralleled response increments in quinine-sensitive CT neurons to the same quinine increases. A 1.43 Hz bursting rhythm to the sweeteners was unchanged by quinine inhibition or decreases in sweetener concentration. Taste-bud processing, possibly between-cell inhibition and within-cell negative feedback, must modify signals initiated by T1 receptors before they are transmitted to the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15925146     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  15 in total

1.  Breadth of tuning and taste coding in mammalian taste buds.

Authors:  Seth M Tomchik; Stephanie Berg; Joung Woul Kim; Nirupa Chaudhari; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cell-to-cell communication in intact taste buds through ATP signalling from pannexin 1 gap junction hemichannels.

Authors:  Robin Dando; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  TRPs in taste and chemesthesis.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2014

4.  CALHM1 Deletion in Mice Affects Glossopharyngeal Taste Responses, Food Intake, Body Weight, and Life Span.

Authors:  Göran Hellekant; Jared Schmolling; Philippe Marambaud; Teresa A Rose-Hellekant
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Cycloheximide: no ordinary bitter stimulus.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Bradley K Formaker; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Responses of the hamster chorda tympani nerve to sucrose+acid and sucrose+citrate taste mixtures.

Authors:  Bradley K Formaker; Hsung Lin; Thomas P Hettinger; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Salt taste inhibition by cathodal current.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Sweet-bitter and umami-bitter taste interactions in single parabrachial neurons in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Kenichi Tokita; John D Boughter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The taste of sugars.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.