Literature DB >> 9108760

Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences.

K A Kern1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze 44 cases of malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cost, cause, and consequences of civil court actions.
DESIGN: Survey of national jury verdict reporting services, covering 20 states during the 39-month interval from January 1, 1993, to April 30, 1996. The 44 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the 40-month interval from February 1, 1989, to June 30, 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Types of injuries leading to litigation, morbidity and mortality from injuries, trial verdicts, and cost of liability payments.
RESULTS: The 44 injuries composed 4 main categories of injuries: (1) bile duct, n = 27, 61%; (2) bowel, n = 7, 16%; (3) major vascular, n = 4, 9%; and (4) other, n = 6, 14%. Bowel injuries involved trocar or cautery injury; vascular injuries all involved trocars. There were 7 deaths (16%) overall from either septic peritonitis resulting from bowel injury (4 patients [57%]) or bile peritonitis involving spills or cystic duct leaks (3 patients [43%]). No deaths resulted from injury to main bile ducts. Of the 44 cases, 21 (48%) settled out of court (mean payment, $469,711). Of the remaining 23 cases proceeding to trial, 19 (83%) were defended successfully while 4 (17%) concluded with plaintiff jury verdicts (mean payment, $188,772).
CONCLUSIONS: Frequent settlements of cases involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries that are litigated have resulted in a selection of cases of increased defensibility at trial. The high mortality rate from bowel injuries is a new medicolegal finding in laparoscopic cholecystectomies, as expensive to settle (mean payment, $438,000) as laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injury (mean payment, $507,000).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9108760     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280066009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  30 in total

1.  Direct visual or blind insertion of the primary trocar.

Authors:  S Jirecek; M Dräger; H Leitich; F Nagele; R Wenzl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy: a reliable tool for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Michele Simone; Didier Mutter; Francesco Rubino; Erik Dutson; Catherine Roy; Luc Soler; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M T P R Perera; M A Silva; A J Shah; R Hardstaff; S R Bramhall; J Issac; J A C Buckels; D F Mirza
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  James R H Scurr; Julian R Brigstocke; David A Shields; John H Scurr
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Are energy sources required in laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Or should they be standby?

Authors:  B B Agarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Surgical treatment of benign lesions and strictures of the bile ducts].

Authors:  J Y Tracey; A R Moossa
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Increasing bile duct injury and decreasing utilization of intraoperative cholangiogram and common bile duct exploration over 14 years: an analysis of outcomes in New York State.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Nabeel Obeid; Chencan Zhu; Mark Talamini; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source: a modified technique.

Authors:  B B Agarwal; Brij Agarwal; Manish Gupta; Sneh Agarwal; Krishan Mahajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.