Literature DB >> 15919174

The influence of case load and the extent of resection on the quality of treatment outcome in gastric cancer.

H-J Meyer1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The background was to analyse the influence of hospital- and surgeon volume and of the extent of resective procedures on the quality of early and late treatment results in gastric cancer.
METHODS: The literature was reviewed by searching the databases of Medline, Cancerlit, Pubmed and the Cochran register.
RESULTS: The levels of evidence showed wide variations. The influence of hospital volume was more important for the outcome than the case load of the individual surgeon. The extent of surgical resection should be adapted to histology--or stage. The value of systematic lymph node dissection is still under discussion.
CONCLUSIONS: We have found that the best treatment results were seen in high volume hospitals with experienced surgeons, even taking into account extended surgical procedures. Further studies are needed to define the optimal number of operations necessary to be carried out each year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919174     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  18 in total

1.  Risk factors related to operative morbidity in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Gil-Rendo; J L Hernández-Lizoain; F Martínez-Regueira; A Sierra Martínez; F Rotellar Sastre; M Cervera Delgado; V Valentí Azcarate; C Pastor Idoate; J Alvarez-Cienfuegos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Meyer; Hansjochen Wilke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  [Surgery of gastric cancer in a medium volume center].

Authors:  F Wahnschaff; U Clauer; J Roder
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Current S3 guidelines on surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma].

Authors:  H-J Meyer; A H Hölscher; F Lordick; H Messmann; S Mönig; C Schumacher; M Stahl; H Wilke; M Möhler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  [Surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. German multicenter observational studies].

Authors:  K Ridwelski; I Gastinger; H Ptok; F Meyer; H Dralle; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Gastric cancer.

Authors:  Henk H Hartgrink; Edwin P M Jansen; Nicole C T van Grieken; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Value of geriatric frailty and nutritional status assessment in predicting postoperative mortality in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Juul J W Tegels; M F G de Maat; K W E Hulsewé; A G M Hoofwijk; J H M B Stoot
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgeons' knowledge of quality indicators for gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Lucy K Helyer; Catherine O'Brien; Natalie G Coburn; Carol J Swallow
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Defining the Impact of Surgical Approach on Perioperative Outcomes for Patients with Gastric Cardia Malignancy.

Authors:  Ryan W Day; Brian D Badgwell; Keith F Fournier; Paul F Mansfield; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Self-reported experience and outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients at a median follow-up time of 27 months from diagnosis.

Authors:  Sung Kim; Jae-Moon Bae; Young-Woo Kim; Keun Won Ryu; Jun Ho Lee; Jae-Hyung Noh; Tae-Sung Sohn; Seong-Kweon Hong; Myung Kyung Lee; Sang Min Park; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.