Literature DB >> 17909862

Self-reported experience and outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients at a median follow-up time of 27 months from diagnosis.

Sung Kim1, Jae-Moon Bae, Young-Woo Kim, Keun Won Ryu, Jun Ho Lee, Jae-Hyung Noh, Tae-Sung Sohn, Seong-Kweon Hong, Myung Kyung Lee, Sang Min Park, Young Ho Yun.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: We aimed to identify clinical experiences associated with outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-two patients who had a diagnosis of stage I-III stomach cancer from 2001 through 2002 from two hospitals in South Korea responded to a survey questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical data, information about care experiences, satisfaction with care, and quality of life (QOL). MAIN
RESULTS: Involvement in decision making [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13 to 2.89] and reflection of patients' opinions in treatment decisions (aOR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.93) were associated with decision satisfaction. The factors associated with willingness to choose the same treatment over again were involvement in decision making (aOR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.68) and no treatment toxicity (aOR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.87). Involvement in decision making, reflection of patients' opinions in treatment decisions, and treatment toxicity were associated with some functioning subscales of QOL (p < 0.05). Regular follow-up, however, was associated with poor social functioning.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts for stomach cancer patients should focus not only on the quality of primary tumor therapy but also on how patients experience their care, such as patient-centered decision making, experience of treatment toxicity, and regular follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909862     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0340-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  28 in total

1.  Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality.

Authors:  Eric C Schneider; Jennifer L Malin; Katherine L Kahn; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Descriptive review of the literature on breast cancer outcomes: 1990 through 2000.

Authors:  Jeanne Mandelblatt; Catherine Armetta; K Robin Yabroff; Wenchi Liang; William Lawrence
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2004

3.  Validation study of the korean version of the brief fatigue inventory.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Xin Shelley Wang; Jung Suk Lee; Ju Won Roh; Chang Geol Lee; Won Sup Lee; Keun Seok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  [The quality of life of tumor patients as a multidimensional concept].

Authors:  P Leiberich; M Averbeck; M Grote-Kusch; A Schroeder; E Olbrich; J R Kalden
Journal:  Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal       Date:  1993

5.  Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Atsushi Nashimoto; Akira Kurita; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Taira Kinoshita; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kunio Okajima
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumors treated with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate.

Authors:  Jaap J M Teunissen; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Eric P Krenning
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].

Authors:  Marina Davoli; Laura Amato; Silvia Minozzi; Anna Maria Bargagli; Simona Vecchi; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2005 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.901

9.  Patient satisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; William C Hunt; Frank D Gilliland; Robert A Stephenson; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Assessment of satisfaction with care after inpatient treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  V Kavadas; C P Barham; M D Finch-Jones; J Vickers; E Sanford; D Alderson; J M Blazeby
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Are we missing the Institute of Medicine's mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care.

Authors:  Flora Tzelepis; Shiho K Rose; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Mariko L Carey; Christine L Paul
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.