Literature DB >> 15919126

Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI.

Xavier Geets1, Jean-François Daisne, Stephano Arcangeli, Emmanuel Coche, Marian De Poel, Thierry Duprez, Grazia Nardella, Vincent Grégoire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the inter-observer variability between CT and MRI for the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal SCC, parotid glands and spinal cord. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty pharyngo-laryngeal tumors were delineated by five observers on CT and MRI, using consistent delineation guidelines. Spinal cords and parotid glands were also delineated on CT and MRI by three observers. Mean GTVs and coefficients of variation were calculated for each observer and compared using ANOVA and its derived Pearson intra-class coefficient (R). For GTVs, a mismatch analysis (ratio between intersection and union volumes) was also performed.
RESULTS: Regarding oropharyngeal GTVs (n=10), no significant difference was observed between observers either with CT (33.9, 31.1, 32, 34 and 34.7 ml, five observers, P=0.47) or with MRI (30.5, 29.4, 30.1 and 31.5 ml, four observers, P=0.59). CVs (13.6 vs 12.9%), (0.98 vs 0.99) and mismatches (0.43 vs 0.42) between CT and MRI did not significantly differ. Regarding laryngeal-hypopharyngeal GTVs (n=10), no significant difference was observed between observers either on CT (18.1, 20.7, 20.9, 19.3 and 21.9 ml, five observers, P=0.29) or on MRI (19.3, 21.5, 20, 22.1 and 21.8 ml, five observers, P=0.16). CVs (20.2 vs 13.8%), (0.94 vs 0.94) and mismatches (0.31 vs 0.41) were comparable. Regarding OARs, a small but significant difference in mean parotid volume was observed between observers (P<0.001) and between modalities (P<0.001) (CT: 34.8, 29.4, and 26.8 ml; MRI: 30.6, 27.9 and 20.4 ml). Similar results were obtained for mean spinal cord volumes (CT: 10.7, 10.6, and 9.5 ml; MRI: 8.7, 8.5 and 8.2 ml; P=0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919126     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  45 in total

Review 1.  Current progress in adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  David L Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  The influence of initial outlines on manual segmentation.

Authors:  William F Sensakovic; Adam Starkey; Rachael Roberts; Christopher Straus; Philip Caligiuri; Masha Kocherginsky; Samuel G Armato
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Influence of the type of imaging on the delineation process during the treatment planning.

Authors:  Weronika Jackowiak; Bartosz Bąk; Anna Kowalik; Adam Ryczkowski; Małgorzata Skórska; Małgorzata Paszek-Widzińska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-06-18

Review 4.  Balancing risk and reward in target delineation for highly conformal radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Broadening the scope of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

Authors:  Carlo Greco; C Clifton Ling
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Definition of the CTV prostate in CT and MRI by using CT-MRI image fusion in IMRT planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Hentschel; Wolfgang Oehler; Dirk Strauss; Andreas Ulrich; Ansgar Malich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  PET imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Differding; François-Xavier Hanin; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Interobserver and intermodality variability in GTV delineation on simulation CT, FDG-PET, and MR Images of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Carryn M Anderson; Wenqing Sun; John M Buatti; Joan E Maley; Bruno Policeni; Sarah L Mott; John E Bayouth
Journal:  Jacobs J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-09

9.  C4/5 foraminal stenosis predicts C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Lee; Jae-Sung Ahn; Byungkon Shin; Hoseok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer-can an old goal evolve into a new standard?

Authors:  David L Schwartz; Lei Dong
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.