Literature DB >> 20527549

The influence of initial outlines on manual segmentation.

William F Sensakovic1, Adam Starkey, Rachael Roberts, Christopher Straus, Philip Caligiuri, Masha Kocherginsky, Samuel G Armato.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Initial outlines are often presented as an aid to reduce the time-cost associated with manual segmentation and measurement of structures in medical images. This study evaluated the influence of initial outlines on manual segmentation intraobserver and interobserver precision.
METHODS: Three observers independently outlined all pleural mesothelioma tumors present in five computed tomography (CT) sections in each of 30 patient scans. After a lapse of time, each observer was presented with the same series of CT sections with the outlines of each observer superimposed as initial outlines. Each observer created altered outlines by altering the initial outlines to reflect their perception of the tumor boundary. Altered outlines were compared to original outlines using the Jaccard similarity coefficient (J). Intraobserver and interobserver precision of observer outlines were calculated by applying linear mixed effects analysis of variance models to the J values. The percent of minor alterations (alterations that resulted in only slight changes in the initial outline) was also recorded.
RESULTS: The average J value between pairs of observer original outlines was 0.371. The average J value between pairs of observer outlines when altered from an identical initial outline was 0.796, indicating increased interobserver precision. The average difference between J values of an observer's segmentation created by altering their own initial outline and when altering a different observer's initial outline was 0.476, indicating initial outlines strongly influence intraobserver precision. Observers made minor alterations on 74.5% of initial outlines with which they were presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraobserver and interobserver precision were strongly dependent on the initial outline. These effects are likely due to the tendency of observers to make only minor corrections to initial outlines. This finding could impact observer study design, tumor growth assessment, computer-aided diagnosis system validation, and radiation therapy target volume definition when initial outlines are used as an observer aid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20527549      PMCID: PMC2874038          DOI: 10.1118/1.3392287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Reproducibility of linear tumor measurements using PACS: comparison of caliper method with edge-tracing method.

Authors:  Wayne L Monsky; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Mary T Keogan; David Doty; Ihab Kamel; Chun Sam Yam; Bernard J Ransil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Richard G Swensson; Sara Golla; Christiane M Hakim; Ratan Shah; Luisa Wallace; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility.

Authors:  Dag Wormanns; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst Klotz; Anke Marheine; Florian Beyer; Walter Heindel; Stefan Diederich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Geoffrey McLennan; Denise R Aberle; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber Macmahon; Brian F Mullan; David F Yankelevitz; Edwin J R van Beek; Samuel G Armato; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Anthony P Reeves; David Gur; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Peyton H Bland; Gary Laderach; Richie Pais; David Qing; Chris Piker; Junfeng Guo; Adam Starkey; Daniel Max; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels.

Authors:  H Bolte; T Jahnke; F K W Schäfer; R Wenke; B Hoffmann; S Freitag-Wolf; V Dicken; J M Kuhnigk; J Lohmann; S Voss; N Knöss; M Heller; J Biederer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Evaluation of tumor measurements in oncology: use of film-based and electronic techniques.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; M S Ginsberg; D DeCorato; L N Rothenberg; S Einstein; P Kijewski; D M Panicek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements.

Authors:  Hester A Gietema; Ying Wang; Dongming Xu; Rob J van Klaveren; Harry de Koning; Ernst Scholten; Johny Verschakelen; Gerhard Kohl; Matthijs Oudkerk; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Clinical diagnosis and the order of information.

Authors:  G R Bergus; G B Chapman; B T Levy; J W Ely; R A Oppliger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI.

Authors:  Xavier Geets; Jean-François Daisne; Stephano Arcangeli; Emmanuel Coche; Marian De Poel; Thierry Duprez; Grazia Nardella; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Caroline Rm Boggis; Magnus A McGee; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Maureen Gc Gillan; Mary Wilson; Anil K Jain; Nicola Barr; Ursula M Beetles; Miriam A Griffiths; Jill Johnson; Rita M Roberts; Heather E Deans; Karen A Duncan; Geeta Iyengar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variability of tumor area measurements for response assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zacariah E Labby; Christopher Straus; Philip Caligiuri; Heber MacMahon; Ping Li; Alexandra Funaki; Hedy L Kindler; Samuel G Armato
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.