Literature DB >> 15917986

Impact of a community-based osteoporosis and fall prevention program on fracture incidence.

Ann-Charlotte Grahn Kronhed1, Carina Blomberg, Nadine Karlsson, Owe Löfman, Toomas Timpka, Margareta Möller.   

Abstract

Associations between a 10-year community-based osteoporosis and fall prevention program and fracture incidence amongst middle-aged and elderly residents in an intervention community are studied, and comparisons are made with a control community. A health-education program was provided to all residents in the intervention community, which addressed dietary intake, physical activity, smoking habits and environmental risk factors for osteoporosis and falls. Both communities are small, semi-rural and situated in Ostergotland County in southern Sweden. The analysis is based on incidences of forearm fractures in the population 40 years of age or older, and hip fractures in the population 50 years of age or older. Data for three 5-year periods (pre-, early and late intervention) are accumulated and compared. In the intervention community, forearm fracture incidence decreased in women. There are also tendencies towards decreasing forearm fracture incidence in men, and towards decreasing trochanteric hip fracture incidences in women and in men in the late intervention period. No such changes in fracture incidences are found in the control community. Cervical hip fracture incidence did not change in the intervention and the control communities. Although the reported numbers of fractures are small (a total of 451 forearm and 357 hip fractures), the numbers are based on total community populations and thus represent a true difference. The decrease in forearm fracture incidence among women, and the tendency towards decreasing trochanteric hip fractures, in contrast to the absence of change in cervical hip fractures, might be mainly due to a more rapid effect of fall preventive measures than an increase in bone strength in the population. For the younger age groups an expected time lag between intervention and effect might invalidate the short follow-up period for outcome measurements. Thus, the effect of the 10-year intervention program on fracture incidence should be followed during an extended post-intervention period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15917986     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1732-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

1.  Logics and logistics of community intervention against osteoporosis: an evidence basis.

Authors:  J Waller; M Angbratt; C Blomberg; A C Kronhed; L Larsson; O Löfman; M Möller; G Toss; M Foldevi; E Trell
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Knowledge of osteoporosis in a Swedish municipality--a prospective study.

Authors:  John Waller; Olle Eriksson; Mats Foldevi; Ann-Charlotte Grahn Kronhed; Lasse Larsson; Owe Löfman; Göran Toss; Margareta Möller
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Community education for cardiovascular disease prevention: risk factor changes in the Minnesota Heart Health Program.

Authors:  R V Luepker; D M Murray; D R Jacobs; M B Mittelmark; N Bracht; R Carlaw; R Crow; P Elmer; J Finnegan; A R Folsom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The Harstad injury prevention study: the characteristics and distribution of fractures amongst elders--an eight year study.

Authors:  B Ytterstad
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Differences in risk factor patterns between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures. Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  K Michaëlsson; E Weiderpass; B Y Farahmand; J A Baron; P G Persson; L Zidén; C Zetterberg; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  World-wide projections for hip fracture.

Authors:  B Gullberg; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types.

Authors:  O Löfman; K Berglund; L Larsson; G Toss
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Increased hip-fracture incidence in the county of Ostergötland, Sweden, 1940-1986, with forecasts up to the year 2000: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  R Nilsson; O Löfman; K Berglund; L Larsson; G Toss
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Effects of physical exercise on bone mass, balance skill and aerobic capacity in women and men with low bone mineral density, after one year of training--a prospective study.

Authors:  A C Kronhed; M Möller
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection.

Authors:  C Cooper; G Campion; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Unmet needs in fracture prevention: new European guidelines for the investigation and registration of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Shorter unipedal standing time and lower bone mineral density in women with distal radius fractures.

Authors:  A Sakai; T Oshige; Y Zenke; Y Yamanaka; H Otsuka; T Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Optimal management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss: considerations for elderly patients.

Authors:  Karen Tipples; Anne Robinson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  [Compliance of osteoporosis patients with additional specific osteoporosis-training course].

Authors:  T Tuncel; J Hasselberg; K M Peters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Metabolic bone diseases].

Authors:  F Jakob
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; G Hawker; V Bansod; N M Salbach; M Zwarenstein; J Carroll; D Brooks; C Cameron; E Bogoch; L Jaakkimainen; H Kreder
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Austrian Osteoporosis Report: epidemiology, lifestyle factors, public health strategies.

Authors:  Thomas Dorner; Elisabeth Weichselbaum; Kitty Lawrence; K Viktoria Stein; Anita Rieder
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009-05

8.  Long-term effects of a ten-year osteoporosis intervention program in a Swedish population-A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Grahn Kronhed; Helena Salminen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-01-02

9.  What factors affect the methodological and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines for osteoporosis? Protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Peng-Zhong Fang; Ya-Min Chen; Jin-Lei Chen; Jun-Hao Sun; Jian-Shi Tan; Rui-Rui Wang; Xin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.