Literature DB >> 15917323

Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee.

D F Collins1, K M Refshauge, G Todd, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying the sense of joint position and movement remain controversial. While cutaneous receptors are known to contribute to kinesthesia for the fingers, the present experiments test the hypothesis that they contribute at other major joints. Illusory movements were evoked at the interphalangeal (IP) joints of the index finger, the elbow, and the knee by stimulation of populations of cutaneous and muscle spindle receptors, both separately and together. Subjects matched perceived movements with voluntary movements of homologous joints on the contralateral side. Cutaneous receptors were activated by stretch of the skin (using 2 intensities of stretch) and vibration activated muscle spindle receptors. Stimuli were designed to activate receptors that discharge during joint flexion. For the index finger, vibration was applied over the extensor tendons on the dorsum of the hand, to evoke illusory metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint flexion, and skin stretch was delivered around the IP joints. The strong skin stretch evoked the illusion of flexion of the proximal IP joint in 6/8 subjects (12 +/- 5 degrees, mean +/- SE). For the group, strong skin stretch delivered during vibration increased the perceived flexion of the proximal IP joint by eight times with a concomitant decrease in perceived flexion of the MCP joint compared with vibration alone (P < 0.05). For the elbow, vibration was applied over the distal tendon of triceps brachii and skin stretch over the dorsal forearm. When delivered alone, strong skin stretch evoked illusory elbow flexion in 5/10 subjects (9 +/- 4 degrees). Simultaneous strong skin stretch and vibration increased the illusory elbow flexion for the group by 1.5 times compared with vibration (P < 0.05). For the knee, vibration was applied over the patellar tendon and skin stretch over the thigh. Skin stretch alone evoked illusory knee flexion in 3/10 subjects (8 +/- 4 degrees) and when delivered during vibration, perceived knee flexion increased for the group by 1.4 times compared with vibration (P < 0.05). Hence inputs from cutaneous receptors, muscle receptors, and combined inputs from both receptors likely subserve kinesthesia at joints throughout the body.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15917323     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00191.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  109 in total

1.  Can loss of muscle spindle afferents explain the ataxic gait in Riley-Day syndrome?

Authors:  Vaughan G Macefield; Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Joel Gutiérrez; Felicia B Axelrod; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Dynamic changes in the perceived posture of the hand during ischaemic anaesthesia of the arm.

Authors:  N Inui; L D Walsh; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Processing afferent proprioceptive information at the main cuneate nucleus of anesthetized cats.

Authors:  Roberto Leiras; Patricia Velo; Francisco Martín-Cora; Antonio Canedo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

7.  Long-latency reflexes of elbow and shoulder muscles suggest reciprocal excitation of flexors, reciprocal excitation of extensors, and reciprocal inhibition between flexors and extensors.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Jenna Meriggi; Nidhi Parikh; Kenneth Saad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task.

Authors:  Ellie Frayne; Susan Coulson; Roger Adams; Glen Croxson; Gordon Waddington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert; Jon W Sensinger; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Zachary C Thumser; Raviraj Nataraj; Dylan T Beckler; Michael R Dawson; Dan H Blustein; Satinder Gill; Brett D Mensh; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Madeline D Newcomb; Jason P Carey; Beth M Orzell
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Skin Cooling and Force Replication at the Ankle in Healthy Individuals: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daniela Pacheco dos Santos Haupenthal; Marcos de Noronha; Alessandro Haupenthal; Caroline Ruschel; Guilherme S Nunes
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.