Literature DB >> 15915800

Visual and proprioceptive representations in spatial memory.

Naohide Yamamoto1, Amy L Shelton.   

Abstract

It has been shown that spatial information can be acquired from both visual and nonvisual modalities. The present study explored how spatial information from vision and proprioception was represented in memory, investigating orientation dependence of spatial memories acquired through visual and proprioceptive spatial learning. Experiment 1 examined whether visual learning alone and proprioceptive learning alone yielded orientation-dependent spatial memory. Results showed that spatial memories from both types of learning were orientation dependent. Experiment 2 explored how different orientations of the same environment were represented when they were learned visually and proprioceptively. Results showed that both visually and proprioceptively learned orientations were represented in spatial memory, suggesting that participants established two different reference systems based on each type of learning experience and interpreted the environment in terms of these two reference systems. The results provide some initial clues to how different modalities make unique contributions to spatial representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915800     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Path completion after haptic exploration without vision: implications for haptic spatial representations.

Authors:  R L Klatzky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

2.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.

Authors:  David Waller; Daniel R Montello; Anthony E Richardson; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Yvonne Lippa; Jack M Loomis; Reginald G Golledge
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Representing spatial location and layout from sparse kinesthetic contacts.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Susan J Lederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments.

Authors:  David Waller; Jack M Loomis; Daniel B M Haun
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

Review 7.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Visual memories from nonvisual experiences.

Authors:  A L Shelton; T P McNamara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

9.  Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: the role of multiple orientations.

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

10.  Spatial memory and perspective taking.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Authors:  Helene Intraub; Frank Morelli; Kristin M Gagnier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-25

2.  The role of body-based sensory information in the acquisition of enduring spatial representations.

Authors:  David Waller; Nathan Greenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-05

3.  Fixed versus dynamic orientations in environmental learning from ground-level and aerial perspectives.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Holly A Pippitt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-07

4.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

5.  Misperception of exocentric directions in auditory space.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-13

6.  Selection of macroreference frames in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Zachary D Siegel; Lori A Sjolund; Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

7.  Integrating spatial information across experiences.

Authors:  Nathan Greenauer; Catherine Mello; Jonathan W Kelly; Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-09-01

8.  Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Maryann R Betty; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Orientation dependence of spatial memory acquired from auditory experience.

Authors:  Naohide Yamamoto; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Perception of 3-D location based on vision, touch, and extended touch.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Roberta L Klatzky; Christopher R Bennett; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.