Literature DB >> 12760617

Representing spatial location and layout from sparse kinesthetic contacts.

Roberta L Klatzky1, Susan J Lederman.   

Abstract

Participants' fingers were guided to 2 locations on a table for 3 s, then back to the start. They reported distances and angles between the locations by (a) replacing 1 or 2 fingers, (b) translating the contacted configuration, or (c) estimating distance or angle alone. Distance error increased across these conditions. Angular error increased when the angular reference axis was rotated before the response. Replacing 1 finger was impaired by a change in posture from exposure to test. The results suggest a kinesthetic representation is used to replace the fingers, but to estimate distance and angle at new locations, a configural representation is computed. This presentation is oriented within an extrinsic reference frame and maintains shape more accurately than scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760617     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  3 in total

1.  Factors affecting the size of the detour effect in the kinaesthetic perception of Euclidean distance.

Authors:  Henry Faineteau; Edouard Gentaz; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bimanual and unimanual length perception.

Authors:  Virjanand Panday; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual and proprioceptive representations in spatial memory.

Authors:  Naohide Yamamoto; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.