Literature DB >> 22526180

[Prolapse surgery. With abdominal or vaginal meshes?].

H Loertzer1, P Schneider, P Thelen, R H Ringert, A Strauß.   

Abstract

In prolapse surgery several surgical techniques are available. The different open, laparoscopic and vaginal approaches are distinguished by distinct success and relapse rates and operation-specific complications. A safe and optimal therapeutic pelvic floor surgery should be based on the three support levels according to DeLancy and be individually adjusted for every patient. The vaginal approach may be used for all kinds of female genital prolapse and is a comparatively less invasive technique with a short time of convalescence. Apart from stress incontinence there is no need for synthetic meshes in primary approaches and excellent results with low complication and relapse rates can be achieved. An uncritical application of synthetic material is to be avoided in vaginal repair at all times. Abdominal surgical techniques, both open and laparoscopic, present their strengths in the therapeutic approach to level 1 defects or stress incontinence. They provide excellent functional and anatomical corrections and low relapse rates. Abdominally inserted meshes have lower complication rates than vaginal ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526180     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2869-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  72 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of the apical vaginal defect.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Lesley N Otto; John O Bergstrom; Amanda L Clark
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-01-12

3.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  P J Higgs; H-L Chua; A R B Smith
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 5.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

6.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Eric Mandron; Carlos Arroyo; Henry Andrews; Xavier Cathelineau; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: Critical analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  M Meschia; F Bruschi; F Amicarelli; P Pifarotti; M Marchini; P G Crosignani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1999

8.  Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  M Colombo; D Vitobello; F Proietti; R Milani
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Polypropylene as a reinforcement in pelvic surgery is not inert: comparative analysis of 100 explants.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Hannah Yahi; Jean-Claude Hammou; Suzelei Montanari; Pierre Gounon; Henri Clavé
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  [Use of transvaginal polypropylene mesh (Gynemesh) for the treatment of pelvic floor disorders in women. Prospective study in 52 patients].

Authors:  Frédéric Adhoute; Luc Soyeur; Jean-Louis Pariente; Michel Le Guillou; Jean-Marie Ferriere
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.915

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Stress incontinence in elderly women].

Authors:  H Loertzer; P Schneider
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.