Literature DB >> 15913722

Obesity does not adversely affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after anatomic retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Stephen J Freedland1, Michael C Haffner, Patricia K Landis, Christopher S Saigal, H Ballentine Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of obesity on the health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: Patient-reported sexual and urinary HRQOL was assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after anatomic retropubic RP using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index among a cohort of 340 men. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the longitudinal HRQOL scores by body mass index (BMI) adjusting for age, baseline HRQOL, and nerve-sparing status (non-nerve sparing versus unilateral versus bilateral).
RESULTS: At baseline, the sexual and urinary function and bother scores were similar between normal-weight (BMI less than 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI 30 kg/m2 or greater) men. Obese men were as likely to undergo bilateral nerve-sparing surgery as men with a lower BMI. After adjustment for age, baseline HRQOL, and nerve-sparing status, no statistically significant differences were found in any HRQOL score at any point among the BMI groups, except for a lower urinary function score at 24 months among overweight men (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: In a select group of men undergoing RP at a tertiary care referral center, BMI was, in general, unrelated to the baseline and longitudinal postoperative HRQOL scores. Obese men (BMI 30 to 35 kg/m2) should not be selectively discouraged against RP because of concerns about HRQOL. Additional studies are needed to assess the HRQOL outcomes among men with very high BMI values (greater than 35 kg/m2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15913722     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Physical activity and quality of life after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Santa Mina; Andrew G Matthew; John Trachtenberg; George Tomlinson; Crissa L Guglietti; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Wolin; Jason Luly; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Gerald L Andriole; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Obesity and prostate cancer: weighing the evidence.

Authors:  Emma H Allott; Elizabeth M Masko; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  The impact of obesity on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joep G H van Roermund; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Preoperative risk factors for early postoperative urinary continence recovery after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in Chinese patients: a single institute retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Qiqi Mao; Yiwei Lin; Hong Chen; Yu Bai; Jie Qin; Xiangyi Zheng; Ben Liu; Liping Xie
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

7.  Impact of obesity on early erectile function recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ekong E Uffort; James C Jensen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.