Literature DB >> 15908669

Couples who get closer after breast cancer: frequency and predictors in a prospective investigation.

Michel Dorval1, Stéphane Guay, Myrto Mondor, Benoît Mâsse, Maurice Falardeau, André Robidoux, Luc Deschênes, Elizabeth Maunsell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although some couples report an improved relationship since coping with breast cancer together, little quantitative information exists about this phenomenon. We assessed extent to which both couple members report that breast cancer brought them closer and characteristics that predicted this. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study was based on all women with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic disease first treated during recruitment in four Quebec hospitals, in addition to their spouses. Participation was 87% among eligible patients and 91% among spouses of participating patients. Both couple partners were interviewed individually about quality of life at 2 weeks and 3 and 12 months after treatment start. At 12 months, each was asked whether the disease had brought them closer, distanced them, or had no effect.
RESULTS: Overall, 42% of the 282 couples said breast cancer brought them closer, 6% had one or other partner reporting feeling distanced, and less than 1% of couples had both partners reporting feeling distanced. Characteristics assessed explained 31% of variance in the proportion of couples getting closer (P < .0001). After taking into account partners' prediagnosis characteristics and the woman's treatment, the spouse reporting the patient as confidant (P = .003), getting advice from her in the first 2 weeks about coping with breast cancer (P = .03), accompanying her to surgery (P = .057), the patient's reporting more affection from her spouse at 3 months since diagnosis (P = .003) predicted both partners saying the disease brought them closer.
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer can be a growth experience for couples under certain conditions. This information may help reassure patients and their spouses confronting this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15908669     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  Work absence after breast cancer diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mélanie Drolet; Elizabeth Maunsell; Myrto Mondor; Chantal Brisson; Jacques Brisson; Benoît Mâsse; Luc Deschênes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Janelle V Levesque; Darryl J Maybery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Dyadic stress of breast cancer survivors and their caregivers: Are there differences by sexual orientation?

Authors:  Ulrike Boehmer; Jeffrey E Stokes; Angela R Bazzi; Michael Winter; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Prostate cancer and the impact on couples: a qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  Nicole Collaço; Carol Rivas; Lauren Matheson; Johana Nayoan; Richard Wagland; Obrey Alexis; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Eila Watson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Validating the content of a brief informational intervention to empower patients and spouses facing breast cancer: perspectives of both couple members.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Blais; Elizabeth Maunsell; Sophie Grenier; Sophie Lauzier; Michel Dorval; Sylvie Pelletier; Stéphane Guay; André Robidoux; Louise Provencher
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Patterns of confidant use among patients and spouses in the year after breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Maunsell; Stéphane Guay; Evelyne Yandoma; Michel Dorval; Sophie Lauzier; Louise Provencher; André Robidoux
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Noncancer life stresses in newly diagnosed cancer.

Authors:  Ulla-Sisko Lehto; Markku Ojanen; Anna Väkevä; Arpo Aromaa; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Psychological distress of cancer patients with children under 18 years and their partners-a longitudinal study of family relationships using dyadic data analysis.

Authors:  Heide Götze; Michael Friedrich; Elmar Brähler; Georg Romer; Anja Mehnert; Jochen Ernst
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Marital adjustment, satisfaction and dissolution among hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and spouses: a prospective, five-year longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Shelby L Langer; Jean C Yi; Barry E Storer; Karen L Syrjala
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Early stage breast cancer and its association with diet and exercise-related perceptions and behaviors to prevent recurrence.

Authors:  Brian N Fink; Jeffrey G Weiner; Timothy R Jordan; Amy J Thompson; Timothy C Salvage; Mina Coman; Joyce Balls-Berry
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2010-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.