Ulrike Boehmer1, Jeffrey E Stokes2, Angela R Bazzi1, Michael Winter3, Melissa A Clark4. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA. 3. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess dyadic stress among sexual minority cancer survivor and caregivers compared to heterosexual cancer survivors and their caregivers. METHODS: We recruited 167 survivors of nonmetastatic breast cancer of different sexual orientations and their caregivers, who were interviewed via telephone after obtaining consent. We used inverse propensity score weighting to account for differences by sexual orientation in age and length of the survivor-caregiver relationship and simultaneous equation models consistent with the needs for analyzing dyadic data. RESULTS: Survivors and caregivers reported stress levels consistent with population norms, irrespective of survivors' sexual orientation. Accounting for covariates, survivors' and caregivers' stress did not mutually influence one another overall. However, differences by sexual orientation were noted such that caregivers' stress was influential for sexual minority survivors' stress, but not for heterosexual survivors' stress. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration should be given to caregivers of sexual minority survivors, an underserved group for whom currently no interventions exist.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess dyadic stress among sexual minority cancer survivor and caregivers compared to heterosexual cancer survivors and their caregivers. METHODS: We recruited 167 survivors of nonmetastatic breast cancer of different sexual orientations and their caregivers, who were interviewed via telephone after obtaining consent. We used inverse propensity score weighting to account for differences by sexual orientation in age and length of the survivor-caregiver relationship and simultaneous equation models consistent with the needs for analyzing dyadic data. RESULTS: Survivors and caregivers reported stress levels consistent with population norms, irrespective of survivors' sexual orientation. Accounting for covariates, survivors' and caregivers' stress did not mutually influence one another overall. However, differences by sexual orientation were noted such that caregivers' stress was influential for sexual minority survivors' stress, but not for heterosexual survivors' stress. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration should be given to caregivers of sexual minority survivors, an underserved group for whom currently no interventions exist.
Authors: Ulrike Boehmer; Yorghos Tripodis; Angela R Bazzi; Michael Winter; Melissa A Clark Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Tim W Regan; Sylvie D Lambert; Brian Kelly; Mariana Falconier; David Kissane; Janelle V Levesque Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Patricia A Ganz; Lorna Kwan; Annette L Stanton; Janice L Krupnick; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Julienne E Bower; Thomas R Belin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tess Thompson; Katie Heiden-Rootes; Miriam Joseph; L Anne Gilmore; LaShaune Johnson; Christine M Proulx; Emily L Albright; Maria Brown; Jane A McElroy Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.634