Literature DB >> 15908573

Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking.

Dima Kozakov1, Karl H Clodfelter, Sandor Vajda, Carlos J Camacho.   

Abstract

Clustering is one of the most powerful tools in computational biology. The conventional wisdom is that events that occur in clusters are probably not random. In protein docking, the underlying principle is that clustering occurs because long-range electrostatic and/or desolvation forces steer the proteins to a low free-energy attractor at the binding region. Something similar occurs in the docking of small molecules, although in this case shorter-range van der Waals forces play a more critical role. Based on the above, we have developed two different clustering strategies to predict docked conformations based on the clustering properties of a uniform sampling of low free-energy protein-protein and protein-small molecule complexes. We report on significant improvements in the automated prediction and discrimination of docked conformations by using the cluster size and consensus as a ranking criterion. We show that the success of clustering depends on identifying the appropriate clustering radius of the system. The clustering radius for protein-protein complexes is consistent with the range of the electrostatics and desolvation free energies (i.e., between 4 and 9 Angstroms); for protein-small molecule docking, the radius is set by van der Waals interactions (i.e., at approximately 2 Angstroms). Without any a priori information, a simple analysis of the histogram of distance separations between the set of docked conformations can evaluate the clustering properties of the data set. Clustering is observed when the histogram is bimodal. Data clustering is optimal if one chooses the clustering radius to be the minimum after the first peak of the bimodal distribution. We show that using this optimal radius further improves the discrimination of near-native complex structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15908573      PMCID: PMC1366636          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.058768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  30 in total

1.  Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association.

Authors:  C J Camacho; Z Weng; S Vajda; C DeLisi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Activation of the LicT transcriptional antiterminator involves a domain swing/lock mechanism provoking massive structural changes.

Authors:  Marc Graille; Cong-Zhao Zhou; Véronique Receveur-Bréchot; Bruno Collinet; Nathalie Declerck; Herman van Tilbeurgh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins.

Authors:  D Shortle; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins.

Authors:  C Mattos; D Ringe
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies.

Authors:  K Karplus; C Barrett; R Hughey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar.

Authors:  R R Gabdoulline; R C Wade
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Protein docking for low-resolution structures.

Authors:  I A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1995-04

8.  Exploring the binding site structure of the PPAR gamma ligand-binding domain by computational solvent mapping.

Authors:  Shu-Hsien Sheu; Taner Kaya; David J Waxman; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Organic solvents identify specific ligand binding sites on protein surfaces.

Authors:  E Liepinsh; G Otting
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Cluster analysis of consensus water sites in thrombin and trypsin shows conservation between serine proteases and contributions to ligand specificity.

Authors:  P C Sanschagrin; L A Kuhn
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Structure-based discovery of antibacterial drugs.

Authors:  Katie J Simmons; Ian Chopra; Colin W G Fishwick
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Bayesian Active Learning for Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification in Protein Docking.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Yang Shen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  How good is automated protein docking?

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Dmitri Beglov; Tanggis Bohnuud; Scott E Mottarella; Bing Xia; David R Hall; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

4.  DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dima Kozakov; Ryan Brenke; Stephen R Comeau; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

7.  Detection of peptide-binding sites on protein surfaces: the first step toward the modeling and targeting of peptide-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Assaf Lavi; Chi Ho Ngan; Dana Movshovitz-Attias; Tanggis Bohnuud; Christine Yueh; Dmitri Beglov; Ora Schueler-Furman; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

8.  FRODOCK: a new approach for fast rotational protein-protein docking.

Authors:  José Ignacio Garzon; José Ramón Lopéz-Blanco; Carles Pons; Julio Kovacs; Ruben Abagyan; Juan Fernandez-Recio; Pablo Chacon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions.

Authors:  David W Ritchie; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  SUMOylation of nuclear actin.

Authors:  Wilma A Hofmann; Alessandro Arduini; Samantha M Nicol; Carlos J Camacho; James L Lessard; Frances V Fuller-Pace; Primal de Lanerolle
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.