Literature DB >> 15905763

Influence of facet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up.

Jean-Charles Le Huec1, Yann Basso, Stephane Aunoble, Tai Friesem, Marco Brayda Bruno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There has been little analysis assessing the correlation between the clinical functional result of total disc replacement and the arthrosis of the posterior facets or the fatty degeneration of the spinal muscles. However, such knowledge is essential for understanding the long-term outcome of devices in functional terms. This prospective study reports the outcome of 64 Maverick (Medtronic) devices implanted between January 2002 and November 2003.
RESULTS: Oswestry score preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up was 43.8 and 23.1, respectively (P < 0.05). Low back pain improved from a mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 7.6 +/- 1.7 preoperatively to 3.2 +/- 1.8 at 2 years. Mean VAS leg pain score decreased from 3.9 to 2.1 at 2 years (P < 0.05). Facet osteoarthritis grade 1 or 2 did not influence outcome (P = 0.82). On the other hand, muscle degeneration of grades 1 and 2 led to a better outcome than grades 3 and 4 (P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that a semiconstrained implant with a fixed posterior center of rotation can be implanted with grade 1 and 2 facet arthrosis with a good clinical outcome. This seems to confirm previous work showing that a posterior center of rotation lightens the load on the facets. This is also the first study to show a relationship between muscle fatty degeneration and clinical results since the greater the amount of fat, the less satisfactory the result. These promising midterm results must be confirmed by further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15905763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  17 in total

1.  Video-assisted minimally invasive lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Roberto Bassani; Aldo Sinigaglia; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Status quo of facet joint replacement].

Authors:  K Büttner-Janz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Biomechanical changes of the lumbar segment after total disc replacement : charite(r), prodisc(r) and maverick(r) using finite element model study.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Bi-O Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-06-30

4.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Karsten Wiechert; Mohamed F Khattab; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Francine Schranck; Nicholas D Wharton; Douglas P Beall; Elizabeth Jones; Mark E Myers; John A Hipp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Two-level total lumbar disc replacement.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 2: distraction and posterior translation lead to clinical failure after a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Eike K Hoff; Marc Schürings; Hendrik Schmidt; Marcel Dreischarf; Antonius Rohlmann; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.