Literature DB >> 15905483

Interventions to regulate ordering of serum magnesium levels: report of an unintended consequence of decision support.

S Trent Rosenbloom1, Kou-Wei Chiu, Daniel W Byrne, Doug A Talbert, Eric G Neilson, Randolph A Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unintended consequences of computerized patient care system interventions may increase resource use, foster clinical errors, and reduce users' confidence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three successive interventions designed to reduce serum magnesium test ordering through a care provider order entry system (CPOE). The second, modeled after a previously successful intervention, caused paradoxical increases in magnesium test ordering rates.
DESIGN: A time-series analysis modeled weekly rates of magnesium test ordering, underlying trends, the impact of the three successive interventions, and the impact of potential covariates. The first intervention exhorted users to discontinue unnecessary tests recurring more than 72 hours into the future. The second displayed recent magnesium, calcium, and phosphorus test results, limited testing to one test instance per order, and provided education regarding appropriate indications for testing. The third targeted only magnesium ordering, displayed recent results, limited testing to one instance per order, summarized indications for testing, and required users to select an indication. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians at Vanderbilt University Hospital, a 609-bed academic inpatient tertiary care facility, from 1998 through 2003. MEASUREMENTS: Weekly rates of new serum magnesium test orders, instances, and results.
RESULTS: At baseline, there were 539 magnesium tests ordered per week. This decreased to 380 (p = 0.001) per week after the first intervention, increased to 491 per week (p < 0.001) after the second, and decreased to 276 per week (p < 0.001) after the third.
CONCLUSION: A clinical decision support intervention intended to regulate testing increased test order rates as an unintended result of decision support. CPOE implementers must carefully design resource-related interventions and monitor their impact over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15905483      PMCID: PMC1205603          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  48 in total

1.  Interactive query workstation: a demonstration of the practical use of UMLS knowledge sources.

Authors:  C Cimino; G O Barnett; D R Blewett; L J Hassan; R Grundmeier; R Merz; J A Kahn; J A Gnassi
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

2.  A feedback system for reducing excessive laboratory tests.

Authors:  J Studnicki; D D Bradham; J Marshburn; P R Foulis; J V Straumfjord
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W M Tierney; M E Miller; C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reducing vancomycin use utilizing a computer guideline: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K G Shojania; D Yokoe; R Platt; J Fiskio; N Ma'luf; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A successful experiment to reduce unnecessary laboratory use in a community hospital.

Authors:  S L Gortmaker; A F Bickford; H O Mathewson; K Dumbaugh; P C Tirrell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.

Authors:  M E Johnston; K B Langton; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The impact of peer management on test-ordering behavior.

Authors:  Eric G Neilson; Kevin B Johnson; S Trent Rosenbloom; William D Dupont; Doug Talbert; Dario A Giuse; Allen Kaiser; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The effects of price information on physicians' test-ordering behavior. Ordering of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  K M Cummings; K B Frisof; M J Long; G Hrynkiewich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  12 in total

1.  The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt.

Authors:  Randolph A Miller; Lemuel R Waitman; Sutin Chen; S Trent Rosenbloom
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Approaches to evaluating electronic prescribing.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Creating resilient IT: how the sign-out sheet shows clinicians make healthcare work.

Authors:  Christopher Nemeth; Mark Nunnally; Michael O'Connor; Richard Cook
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

4.  "I meant that med for Baylee not Bailey!": a mixed method study to identify incidence and risk factors for CPOE patient misidentification.

Authors:  Hannah I Levin; James E Levin; Steven G Docimo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  The Impact of Changes to an Electronic Admission Order Set on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Ellen T Muniga; Todd A Walroth; Natalie C Washburn
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Helen G Lo; Michael E Matheny; Diane L Seger; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  The laboratory test utilization management toolbox.

Authors:  Geoffrey Baird
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 8.  Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Renuka S Bindraban; Maarten J Ten Berg; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Mark H H Kramer; Wouter W Van Solinge; Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Substantial reduction of inappropriate tablet splitting with computerised decision support: a prospective intervention study assessing potential benefit and harm.

Authors:  Renate Quinzler; Simon P W Schmitt; Maria Pritsch; Jens Kaltschmidt; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Rubinstein; Robert Hirsch; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Bereneice Madison; Thomas Taylor; Anne Ranne; Millie Linville; Keri Donaldson; Felicitas Lacbawan; Nancy Cornish
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.