Literature DB >> 15289216

The impact of peer management on test-ordering behavior.

Eric G Neilson1, Kevin B Johnson, S Trent Rosenbloom, William D Dupont, Doug Talbert, Dario A Giuse, Allen Kaiser, Randolph A Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laboratory testing of hospitalized patients, although essential, can be expensive and sometimes excessive. Attempts to reduce unnecessary testing have often been difficult to implement or sustain.
OBJECTIVE: Use of peer management through a resource utilization committee (RUC) to favorably modify test-ordering behavior in a large academic medical center.
DESIGN: Interrupted time-series study.
SETTING: Medical center with inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE) system and database of ordered tests. PARTICIPANTS: Predominantly housestaff physicians but all clinical staff (attending physicians, housestaff, medical students, nurses, advance practice nurses, and other clinical staff) at Vanderbilt University Hospital who used CPOE systems. INTERVENTION: The RUC analyzed the ordering habits of providers during previous years and made 2 interventions by modifying software for the CPOE system. The committee first initiated a daily prompt in the system that asked providers whether they wanted to discontinue tests scheduled beyond 72 hours. After evaluating this first intervention, the committee further constrained testing options by unbundling serum metabolic panel tests (sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine tests) into single components and by reducing the ease of repeating targeted tests (including electrolyte, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and glucose tests; electrocardiography; and portable chest radiography). MEASUREMENTS: Pre- and postintervention volumes of tests; proportion of patients with abnormal targeted chemistry levels after 48 hours; rates of repeated admission, transfer to intensive care units, and mortality; adjusted coefficient of variation for test ordering; and length of stay.
RESULTS: Voluntary reduction of testing beyond 72 hours (first intervention) decreased orders for metabolic panel component tests by 24% (P = 0.02) and electrocardiograms by 57% (P = 0.006) but not orders for portable chest radiographs. Prospective constraints on recurrent test ordering with panel unbundling (second intervention) produced an additional decrease of 51% for metabolic panel component tests (P < 0.001) and 16% for portable chest radiographs (P = 0.03). Incidence of patients with abnormal targeted blood chemistry levels after 48 hours decreased after the intervention (P = 0.02). Postintervention-adjusted coefficients of variation decreased for metabolic panel component tests (P = 0.03) and electrocardiography (P = 0.04). Rates of (adjusted) monthly readmission, transfers to intensive care units, hospital length of stay, and mortality were unchanged. LIMITATIONS: Other activities occurring during the time period of the interventions might have influenced some test-ordering behaviors, and we assessed effects on only a limited number of commonly ordered tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Peer management reduced provider variability by addressing the imperfect ability of clinicians to rescind testing in a timely manner. Hospitals with growing health care costs can improve their resource utilization through peer management of testing behaviors by using CPOE systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15289216     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  39 in total

1.  Provider variation in responses to warnings: do the same providers run stop signs repeatedly?

Authors:  Patrick E Beeler; E John Orav; Diane L Seger; Patricia C Dykes; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt.

Authors:  Randolph A Miller; Lemuel R Waitman; Sutin Chen; S Trent Rosenbloom
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Effect of CPOE user interface design on user-initiated access to educational and patient information during clinical care.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Antoine J Geissbuhler; William D Dupont; Dario A Giuse; Douglas A Talbert; William M Tierney; W Dale Plummer; William W Stead; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The Vanderbilt EvidenceWeb - developing tools to monitor and improve compliance with evidence-based order sets.

Authors:  John Starmer; Nancy Lorenzi; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

7.  Computer-based insulin infusion protocol improves glycemia control over manual protocol.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Boord; Mona Sharifi; Robert A Greevy; Marie R Griffin; Vivian K Lee; Ty A Webb; Michael E May; Lemuel R Waitman; Addison K May; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Electronic medical records as a tool in clinical pharmacology: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  D M Roden; H Xu; J C Denny; R A Wilke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Computerised order entry systems and pathology services--a synthesis of the evidence.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-05

10.  Pre-analytical requirements.

Authors:  John H Livesey; M Jane Ellis; Margaret J Evans
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.