Literature DB >> 2186274

The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests.

W M Tierney1, M E Miller, C J McDonald.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests on their ordering of such tests in an academic primary care medical practice. All tests were ordered at microcomputer workstations by 121 physicians. For half (the intervention group), the charge for the test being ordered and the total charge for tests for that patient on that day were displayed on the computer screen. The remaining physicians (control group) also used the computers but received no message about charges. The primary outcomes measured were the number of tests ordered and the charges for tests per patient visit. In the 14 weeks before the study, the number of tests ordered and the average charge for tests per patient visit were similar for the intervention and control groups. During the 26-week intervention period, the physicians in the intervention group ordered 14 percent fewer tests per patient visit than did those in the control group (P less than 0.005), and the charges for tests were 13 percent ($6.68 per visit) lower (P less than 0.05). The differences were greater for scheduled visits (17 percent fewer tests and 15 percent lower charges for the intervention group; P less than 0.01) than for unscheduled (urgent) visits (11 percent fewer tests and 10 percent lower charges; P greater than 0.3). During the 19 weeks after the intervention ended, the number of tests ordered by the physicians in the intervention group was only 7.7 percent lower than the number ordered by the physicians in the control group, and the charges for tests were only 3.5 percent lower (P greater than 0.3). Three measures of possible adverse outcomes--number of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and outpatient visits during the study period and the following six months--were similar for the patients seen by the physicians in both groups. We conclude that displaying the charges for diagnostic tests significantly reduced the number and cost of tests ordered, especially for patients with scheduled visits. The effects of this intervention did not persist after it was discontinued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2186274     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199005243222105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  105 in total

1.  The dissemination of clinical practice guidelines over an intranet: an evaluation.

Authors:  J J Stolte; J Ash; H Chin
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Analysis of the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners with respect to the use of blood tests.

Authors:  M A van Wijk; A M Bohnen; J van der Lei
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians' time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices.

Authors:  J M Overhage; S Perkins; W M Tierney; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ron Winkens; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

5.  End of visit: design considerations for an ambulatory order entry module.

Authors:  Samuel J Wang; Barry H Blumenfeld; Susan E Roche; Julia A Greim; Karen E Burk; Tejal K Gandhi; David W Bates; Gilad J Kuperman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 6.  An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures.

Authors:  R B Elson; J G Faughnan; D P Connelly
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Decision support and safety of clinical environments.

Authors:  A H Morris
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03

8.  A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.

Authors:  David W Bates; Mark Ebell; Edward Gotlieb; John Zapp; H C Mullins
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The use of computers for clinical care: a case series of advanced U.S. sites.

Authors:  David F Doolan; David W Bates; Brent C James
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; J Marc Overhage; Michael D Murray; Lisa E Harris; Xiao-Hua Zhou; George J Eckert; Faye E Smith; Nancy Nienaber; Clement J McDonald; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.