Literature DB >> 15903146

An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients.

Jonathan W Cray1, Rose L Allen, Andrew Stuart, Suzanne Hudson, Elizabeth Layman, Gregg D Givens.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. A questionnaire was constructed and mailed to 803 adults who received a Clarion cochlear implant system manufactured by Advanced Bionics Corporation. Questionnaire recipients were implanted at least 12 months prior to receiving the questionnaire (i.e., they were implanted in 1998 or 1999). Approximately 60% (n = 478) responded, of whom 70% (n = 336) were considered "telephone users" (i.e., they answered the telephone and/or initiated calls). Telephone users were significantly younger and had significantly more daily hours of cochlear implant use than nonusers. Not surprisingly, there were differences between groups with respect to method of communication (i.e., more users employed oral communication, while more nonusers employed both oral and manual communication) and ability to understand words without lipreading (i.e., more users were able to understand). Thirty-seven percent of the telephone users were male, and 63% were female. The average age was 51.8 years (SD = 15.5). Ninety-five percent of users initiated calls to family and friends, 65% made appointments by phone, and approximately 50% asked for information about a product or service and conducted business over the phone. Over 95% of users could identify a dial tone, a busy signal, and voices. The average telephone use per week was 5.4 hr. Approximately 85% indicated that they were able to interact with strangers on the telephone within 5 months of receiving the sound processor. Approximately 30% communicated via a cellular phone for personal use. The findings of this survey suggest an increase in cochlear implant users' telephone use relative to a decade earlier. Advances in cochlear implant and telephone technologies are 2 of several factors that may contribute to the changes observed.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15903146     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/025)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  9 in total

1.  Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of bandwidth extension to telephone speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chuping Liu; Qian-Jie Fu; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Qudsia Tahmina; Christina Runge; David R Friedland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-20

4.  Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cécile Rumeau; Julien Frère; Bettina Montaut-Verient; Alexis Lion; Gérome Gauchard; Cécile Parietti-Winkler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Javier Galindo; Luis Lassaletta; Rosa Pérez Mora; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Patrick Dubach; Flurin Pfiffner; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Pascal Senn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The effect of internet telephony and a cochlear implant accessory on mobile phone speech comprehension in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Markus E Huth; Regula L Boschung; Marco D Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mantokoudis Georgios
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.236

9.  Influence of Telecommunication Modality, Internet Transmission Quality, and Accessories on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Roger Koller; Jérémie Guignard; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis; Pascal Senn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.