Literature DB >> 15902318

Effects of Developmental Stage and Sex on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Vertical Ground Reaction Forces During Landing.

Erik E Swartz1, Laura C Decoster, Pamela J Russell, Ronald V Croce.   

Abstract

Context: The presence or absence of biomechanical differences between the sexes before puberty may provide clues about the onset of adult landing pattern differences, which may help to explain the greater number of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in females than in males and provide the basis for interventions to reduce those injuries.Objective: To identify developmental sex-related and biomechanical differences during vertical jump landings.Design: A 2 x 2 developmental stage (prepubescent or postpubescent) x sex (male or female) between-subjects design.Setting: Controlled laboratory setting.Patients or Other Participants: Thirty prepubescent subjects (15 boys, age = 9.63 +/- 0.95 years; 15 girls, age = 9.19 +/- 1.00 years) and 28 postpubescent subjects (14 men, age = 23.57 +/- 3.23 years; 14 women, age = 24.22 +/- 2.27 years).Intervention: Subjects performed a vertical jump to a target set at 50% of their maximum vertical jump height ability.Main Outcome Measure(s): Hip and knee kinematics of the dominant lower extremity and vertical ground reaction forces during impact were analyzed.
Results: We found significant main effects for developmental stage. Children demonstrated greater knee valgus and less hip flexion at initial contact and at maximum vertical force, less knee flexion at maximum vertical force, greater maximum vertical force and impulse, and a shorter time to maximum vertical force than the adults. No sex differences were found among the biomechanical variables measured.Conclusions: The presence of significant biomechanical differences between children and adults suggests that physical development influences landing patterns. Sex does not appear to influence landing patterns during a 50% maximum vertical jump landing. These findings add to the body of knowledge regarding developmental and sex comparisons in a functional landing task.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902318      PMCID: PMC1088348     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  29 in total

1.  Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings.

Authors:  S N Zhang; B T Bates; J S Dufek
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Vertical ground reaction forces of children during one- and two-leg rope jumping.

Authors:  Vicki M Pittenger; Steven T McCaw; David Q Thomas
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael J Decker; Michael R Torry; Thomas J Noonan; Amy Riviere; William I Sterett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity.

Authors:  P Devita; W A Skelly
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The assessment of mechanical and neuromuscular response strategies during landing.

Authors:  B L Caster; B T Bates
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete. Potential risk factors.

Authors:  L J Huston; M L Greenfield; E M Wojtys
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights.

Authors:  J L McNitt-Gray
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Decreasing landing forces: effect of instruction.

Authors:  P J McNair; H Prapavessis; K Callender
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 9.  Neuromuscular and hormonal factors associated with knee injuries in female athletes. Strategies for intervention.

Authors:  T E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  B P Boden; G S Dean; J A Feagin; W E Garrett
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  24 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A Comparison of the Habitual Landing Strategies from Differing Drop Heights of Parkour Practitioners (Traceurs) and Recreationally Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Regan J Standing; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Ground reaction forces and loading rates associated with parkour and traditional drop landing techniques.

Authors:  Damien L Puddle; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical factors.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Understanding and preventing acl injuries: current biomechanical and epidemiologic considerations - update 2010.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Kevin R Ford; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-12

7.  ACL Research Retreat VI: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Ajit M Chaudhari; Malcolm Collins; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  What is normal? Female lower limb kinematic profiles during athletic tasks used to examine anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Prevention of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Darin A Padua; Lindsay J DiStefano; Timothy E Hewett; William E Garrett; Stephen W Marshall; Grace M Golden; Sandra J Shultz; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Differences in kinematics of single leg squatting between anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  J Yamazaki; T Muneta; Y J Ju; I Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.