Literature DB >> 7674879

The assessment of mechanical and neuromuscular response strategies during landing.

B L Caster1, B T Bates.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess relative contributions of mechanical and neuromuscular mechanisms to control of landing. Proposed mechanical and neuromuscular response strategies were evaluated relative to lower extremity impact force attenuation. Four subjects performed three conditions of 25 landings from a 60-cm height on each of two days. Additional masses were attached at each ankle for the second and removed for the third condition. Vertical ground reaction force and integrated electromyographic (IEMG) data were used to assess responses. Fourteen of 32 total single subject comparisons were significant in a mechanically predicted direction, indicating the presence of both mechanical and neuromuscular response strategies among subjects. Responses in the mechanical direction for rearfoot impact were consistent with a model predicting mechanical force changes. The presence of mechanical responses for forefoot impact not completely accounted for by the model suggested that the definition of a neuromuscular response not be limited to responses functioning in a protective manner. Multiple regression analyses relating added mass and IEMG to impact force magnitude demonstrated the complex nature of all responses. Vastus medialis IEMG was the most common independent variable included in regression models, emphasizing the importance of knee musculature in landing control.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7674879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  6 in total

1.  Do high impact exercises produce higher tibial strains than running?

Authors:  C Milgrom; A Finestone; Y Levi; A Simkin; I Ekenman; S Mendelson; M Millgram; M Nyska; N Benjuya; D Burr
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  What is normal? Female lower limb kinematic profiles during athletic tasks used to examine anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Lesser magnitudes of lower extremity variability during terminal swing characterizes walking patterns in children with autism.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Eggleston; John R Harry; Patrick A Cereceres; Alyssa N Olivas; Emily A Chavez; Jason B Boyle; Janet S Dufek
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Effects of Developmental Stage and Sex on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Vertical Ground Reaction Forces During Landing.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Laura C Decoster; Pamela J Russell; Ronald V Croce
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Knee movement patterns of injured and uninjured adolescent basketball players when landing from a jump: a case-control study.

Authors:  Quinette Louw; Karen Grimmer; Christopher Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Peak vertical ground reaction force during two-leg landing: a systematic review and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Wenxin Niu; Tienan Feng; Chenghua Jiang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.