Literature DB >> 10953904

Decreasing landing forces: effect of instruction.

P J McNair1, H Prapavessis, K Callender.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of instructions related to joint kinematics, auditory stimuli, and imagery on lowering the vertical ground reaction forces associated with landing from a jump. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: A laboratory in an educational institution.
SUBJECTS: Eighty asymptomatic subjects (27 men) with a mean age of 24 years. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) instruction (limb position instructions); (2) auditory cue (listen to impact sounds); (3) imagery (metaphorical); (4) control. Subjects were required to jump from a box 300 mm in height and land on a force plate. Measures of the ground reaction force were recorded before and after the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The peak vertical ground reaction force recorded at footstrike.
RESULTS: The peak vertical ground reaction forces in the technical instruction and auditory groups were significantly less than those of the control group. There was no significant difference between the auditory and technical instruction groups. There was no significant difference between the imagery and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: When an aim of a rehabilitation programme is to minimise forces on the lower limb during landing type activities, the findings support the use of instructions related to kinematics as well as instructions that draw the patient's attention to the sound at impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10953904      PMCID: PMC1724204          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  13 in total

Review 1.  Imagery and the acquisition of motor skills.

Authors:  C Hall; E Buckolz; G J Fishburne
Journal:  Can J Sport Sci       Date:  1992-03

2.  Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity.

Authors:  P Devita; W A Skelly
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Recalling demonstrated and guided movements using imaginary and verbal rehearsal strategies.

Authors:  C Hall; J Moore; J Annett; W Rodgers
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 4.  On knowing how to do things: a theory of motor imagery.

Authors:  J Annett
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-03

5.  Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements.

Authors:  S Goss; C Hall; E Buckolz; G Fishburne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-11

6.  Muscular control of landing from unexpected falls in man.

Authors:  G M Jones; D G Watt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  The learning of motor skills: sports science and ergonomics perspectives.

Authors:  J Annett
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  In-vivo elastic and damping response of the human leg to impact forces.

Authors:  J Mizrahi; Z Susak
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 9.  Stress fractures in female athletes. Diagnosis, management and rehabilitation.

Authors:  P Brukner; K Bennell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Landing characteristics in subjects with normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joints.

Authors:  P J McNair; R N Marshall
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  30 in total

1.  A Comparison of the Habitual Landing Strategies from Differing Drop Heights of Parkour Practitioners (Traceurs) and Recreationally Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Regan J Standing; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Dynamic Stabilization Time After Isokinetic and Functional Fatigue.

Authors:  Erik A Wikstrom; Michael E Powers; Mark D Tillman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Analysis of the vertical ground reaction forces and temporal factors in the landing phase of a countermovement jump.

Authors:  Daniel Rojano Ortega; Elisabeth C Rodríguez Bíes; Francisco J Berral de la Rosa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  The effect of patellar taping on some landing characteristics during counter movement jumps in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Jesús Cámara; Francisco Díaz; María Soledad Anza; Gaizka Mejuto; Asier Puente; Gorka Iturriaga; Juan-Ramón Fernández
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Ground reaction forces and loading rates associated with parkour and traditional drop landing techniques.

Authors:  Damien L Puddle; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Different modes of feedback and peak vertical ground reaction force during jump landing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hayley M Ericksen; Phillip A Gribble; Kate R Pfile; Brian G Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Neuromuscular differences between prepubescents boys and adult men during drop jump.

Authors:  Savvas Lazaridis; Eleni Bassa; Dimitrios Patikas; Giannis Giakas; Albert Gollhofer; Christos Kotzamanidis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  A feedback inclusive neuromuscular training program alters frontal plane kinematics.

Authors:  Eric K Greska; Nelson Cortes; Bonnie L Van Lunen; James A Oñate
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk assessment.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Instruction and jump-landing kinematics in college-aged female athletes over time.

Authors:  Jena Etnoyer; Nelson Cortes; Stacie I Ringleb; Bonnie L Van Lunen; James A Onate
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.