Literature DB >> 15902189

Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study.

Marie Fidela R Paraiso1, Mark D Walters, Raymond R Rackley, Seham Melek, Cathy Hugney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies for efficacy and safety. STUDY
DESIGN: Charts were reviewed for 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and 61 patients who underwent open sacral colpopexy. Demographic and hospital data, complications, and follow-up visits were reviewed.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 13.5 +/- 12.1 months and 15.7 +/- 18.1 months in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. Mean operating time was significantly greater in the laparoscopic versus open cohort, 269 +/- 65 minutes and 218 +/- 60 minutes, respectively (P < .0001). Estimated blood loss (172 +/- 166 mL vs 234 +/- 149 mL; P = .04) and hospital stay (1.8 +/- 1.0 days vs 4.0 +/- 1.8 days; P < .0001) were significantly less in the laparoscopic group than the open group. Complication and reoperation rates were similar.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies have comparable clinical outcomes. Although laparoscopic sacral colpopexy requires longer operating time, hospital stay is significantly decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902189     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  51 in total

1.  The promise of robotics in urogynecology.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony J Woodruff; Christopher C Roth; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jan Paul Roovers; Paul Lewi; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-29

6.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Sonja Brandner; LaVonne Kots; Nicolle Gygax; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-07

Review 7.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Evaluation of surgical instrument handling on polypropylene mesh using scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  Ali Azadi; Jacek B Jasinski; Sean L Francis; Resad Pasic; Lioudmila Lipetskaia; Nicolette E Deveneau; Taraneh Yeganeh; Donald R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site utero-sacral ligament suspension for apical vaginal prolapse: evaluation of our technique and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Hugo H Davila; Taryn Gallo; Lindsey Bruce; Christopher Landrey
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-09-08

10.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.