Literature DB >> 22428083

Incentives and barriers to neurological clinical research participation.

Anne S Lindblad1, Pam Zingeser, Nil Sismanyazici-Navaie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding barriers and incentives to neurological research participation may improve clinical trial enrollment.
RESULTS: Telephone-based focus groups were conducted with four neurological disorder patient groups (n = 22) and one caregiver group (n = 6). A total of 14 neurologists and neurosurgeons participated in structured interviews. Topics discussed included identifying ways in which health information is gathered and attitudes toward participation in medical research. Interestingly, 86% of physicians interviewed have referred patients to clinical trials and 82% of patients expressed interest in clinical trials participation. Patients cited their primary physician as the best source of health-related information, including information about clinical trials. Barriers to patients and physicians regarding clinical trials participation included compensation. Patients expressed concern about increased visit frequency and required treatment changes.
CONCLUSION: Patients are willing to participate in clinical trials and physicians are willing to refer patients for participation with appropriate compensation for their time and sensitivity to change in care.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22428083      PMCID: PMC3302684          DOI: 10.4155/cli.11.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)        ISSN: 2041-6792


  12 in total

1.  The ecology of medical care revisited.

Authors:  L A Green; G E Fryer; B P Yawn; D Lanier; S M Dovey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Applicability of NINDS-sponsored studies to community-based physician involvement.

Authors:  A S Lindblad; T Clemons; R W Lindblad; R Sykes; K J Meador; J C Odenkirchen; R G Hart
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Clinical trials and tribulations. Spiraling costs threaten gridlock.

Authors:  David Malakoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Factors determining participation in prevention trials among systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Karen H Costenbader; Deborah Brome; Danielle Blanch; Victoria Gall; Elizabeth Karlson; Matthew H Liang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-02-15

5.  Patient and physician attitudes toward breast cancer clinical trials: developing interventions based on understanding barriers.

Authors:  Michelle E Melisko; Fern Hassin; Lauren Metzroth; Dan H Moore; Beth Brown; Kiran Patel; Hope S Rugo; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effectiveness of recruitment in clinical trials: an analysis of methods used in a trial for irritable bowel syndrome patients.

Authors:  Siu Ping Chin Feman; Long T Nguyen; Mary T Quilty; Catherine E Kerr; Bong Hyun Nam; Lisa A Conboy; Joyce P Singer; Min Park; Anthony J Lembo; Ted J Kaptchuk; Roger B Davis
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  The costs of recruitment and retention of women from community-based programs into a randomized controlled contraceptive study.

Authors:  Rebecca E Rdesinski; Alan L Melnick; Elizabeth Dawn Creach; Jessica Cozzens; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2008-05

8.  GPs' experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment.

Authors:  V L Mason; A Shaw; N J Wiles; J Mulligan; T J Peters; D Sharp; G Lewis
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Recruiting and retaining GPs and patients in intervention studies: the DEPS-GP project as a case study.

Authors:  Michelle K Williamson; Jane Pirkis; Jon J Pfaff; Orla Tyson; Moira Sim; Ngaire Kerse; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Nigel P Stocks; Osvaldo P Almeida
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Do we want more cancer patients on clinical trials if so, what are the barriers to greater accrual.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  4 in total

1.  Participant recruitment into a randomised controlled trial of exercise therapy for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Anouska Carter; Liam Humphreys; Nicky Snowdon; Basil Sharrack; Amanda Daley; Jane Petty; Nicola Woodroofe; John Saxton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Community pharmacy lifestyle intervention to increase physical activity and improve cardiovascular health of men with prostate cancer: a phase II feasibility study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lemanska; Karen Poole; Bruce A Griffin; Ralph Manders; John M Saxton; Lauren Turner; Joe Wainwright; Sara Faithfull
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Rationale and design of a Scale-Up Project Evaluating Responsiveness to Home Exercise And Lifestyle Tele-Health (SUPER-HEALTH) in people with physical/mobility disabilities: a type 1 hybrid design effectiveness trial.

Authors:  James H Rimmer; Tapan Mehta; Jereme Wilroy; Byron Lai; Hui-Ju Young; Yumi Kim; Dorothy Pekmezi; Mohanraj Thirumalai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Patient and Caregiver Experiences of Participating in Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Authors:  Olivia Gorzynska; Katie McGoohan; Latha Velayudhan
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.448

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.