Literature DB >> 22723506

A prospective analysis of the influence of older age on physician and patient decision-making when considering enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials (SWOG S0316).

Sara H Javid1, Joseph M Unger, Julie R Gralow, Carol M Moinpour, Antoinette J Wozniak, J Wendall Goodwin, Primo N Lara, Pamela A Williams, Laura F Hutchins, Carolyn C Gotay, Kathy S Albain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients older than 65 years are underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a prospective study (SWOG S0316) to determine physician- and patient-perceived barriers to breast cancer clinical trial enrollment for older patients.
METHODS: Eight geographically diverse SWOG institutions participated. The study assessed patients' and physicians' decisions to enroll in or decline clinical treatment trials, including demographics, trial availability, and eligibility. Patient and physician questionnaires elicited concerns related to treatment, medical status, age, family, and financial or transportation concerns.
RESULTS: A total of 1,079 patients were registered and eligible and 909 (84%) returned for follow-up. The major reason for nonaccrual was either trial unavailability or ineligibility (60%). Older patients were less likely to be eligible for trials (65% for age ≥65 years vs. 78% for age <65 years). If eligible, trial participation rates did not differ significantly by age (34% for age ≥65 years vs. 40% for age <65 years). Patients ≥65 years more often were concerned about side effects, had friends opposed to participation, or believed that participation would not benefit other generations. When trials were available and patients were eligible, physicians discussed trial participation with 76% of patients <65 years versus 58% of patients ≥65 years of age. For patients ≥65 years, 11% of physicians indicated age as a reason they did not enroll a patient in a clinical trial.
CONCLUSION: Trial unavailability or patient ineligibility were the major reasons for lack of enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials for patients of all ages in this prospective study. Older patients were less likely to be eligible for trials, but if eligible they participated at similar rates to younger patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723506      PMCID: PMC3448411          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  28 in total

1.  Guideline for the study and evaluation of gender differences in the clinical evaluation of drugs; notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1993-07-22

Review 2.  Aging and cancer in America. Demographic and epidemiologic perspectives.

Authors:  R Yancik; L A Ries
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.722

3.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials.

Authors:  L F Hutchins; J M Unger; J J Crowley; C A Coltman; K S Albain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate.

Authors:  P M Ellis; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; S M Dunn; N Houssami
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Minority recruitment in the prostate cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; J O Atkinson; S M Thomas; S M Underwood; C Harvey; J Parzuchowski; L C Lovato; A M Ryan; M S Hill; E Deantoni; E R Gritz; I M Thompson; C A Coltman
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Factors that influence the recruitment of patients to Phase III studies in oncology: the perspective of the clinical research associate.

Authors:  James R Wright; Dauna Crooks; Peter M Ellis; Deborah Mings; Tim J Whelan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Survey of oncologists' perceptions of barriers to accrual of older patients with breast carcinoma to clinical trials.

Authors:  Alice B Kornblith; Margaret Kemeny; Bercedis L Peterson; Judith Wheeler; Jeffrey Crawford; Nancy Bartlett; Gini Fleming; Stephen Graziano; Hyman Muss; Harvey Jay Cohen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Breast cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Diana Crivellari; Matti Aapro; Robert Leonard; Gunter von Minckwitz; Etienne Brain; Aron Goldhirsch; Andrea Veronesi; Hyman Muss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Can older cancer patients tolerate chemotherapy? A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Hongbin Chen; Alan Cantor; Julie Meyer; Mary Beth Corcoran; Edward Grendys; Denise Cavanaugh; Shirley Antonek; Angela Camarata; William Haley; Lodovico Balducci; Martine Extermann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  41 in total

1.  Association of Patient Comorbid Conditions With Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Mark E Fleury; Riha Vaidya
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation Among Saudi Nationals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Khalid M Almutairi; Wadi B Alonazi; Abdulaziz A Alodhayani; Jason M Vinluan; Mahaman Moussa; Abdulrahman S Al-Ajlan; Khalid Alsaleh; Duna Alruwaimi; Nader E Alotaibi
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2017-04

Review 3.  Cardio-oncology in the older adult.

Authors:  Prajwal Reddy; Chetan Shenoy; Anne H Blaes
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Elise Cook; Eric Tai; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

5.  Patient Income Level and Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: A Prospective Survey Study.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Julie R Gralow; Kathy S Albain; Scott D Ramsey; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 6.  Is There an Age Threshold for Holding Off on Testing Novel Therapies?

Authors:  Olivia Le Saux; Claire Falandry
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Adult Cancer Survivors' Engagement and Interest in Patient-Centered Research.

Authors:  Margaret M Lubas; Yan Lu; Aaron W Gehr; Bassam Ghabach; Bhavna Tanna; Kalyani Narra; Tara M Brinkman; Rohit P Ojha
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Kathy S Albain; Carol M Moinpour; Judith A Petersen; Kenda Burg; John J Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Inclusion of Older Patients with Cancer in Clinical Trials: The SAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Survey.

Authors:  Florence Canouï-Poitrine; Astrid Lièvre; Florent Dayde; Daniel Lopez-Trabada-Ataz; Isabelle Baumgaertner; Olivier Dubreuil; Francesco Brunetti; Romain Coriat; Karin Maley; Simon Pernot; Christophe Tournigand; Meoin Hagege; Thomas Aparicio; Elena Paillaud; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-19

10.  Enhancing nurse contributions to SWOG clinical trials.

Authors:  Lisa K Hansen; Carol M Moinpour; Rose B Ermete
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.