Literature DB >> 27938416

Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States: gaps and opportunities.

B Bisdorff1, B Schauer2, N Taylor1, V Rodríguez-Prieto3, A Comin4, A Brouwer5, F Dórea4, J Drewe1, L Hoinville1, A Lindberg4, M Martinez Avilés3, B Martínez-López3, M Peyre6, J Pinto Ferreira7, J Rushton1, G VAN Schaik8, K D C Stärk7, C Staubach2, M Vicente-Rubiano3, G Witteveen8, D Pfeiffer1, B Häsler1.   

Abstract

Animal health surveillance enables the detection and control of animal diseases including zoonoses. Under the EU-FP7 project RISKSUR, a survey was conducted in 11 EU Member States and Switzerland to describe active surveillance components in 2011 managed by the public or private sector and identify gaps and opportunities. Information was collected about hazard, target population, geographical focus, legal obligation, management, surveillance design, risk-based sampling, and multi-hazard surveillance. Two countries were excluded due to incompleteness of data. Most of the 664 components targeted cattle (26·7%), pigs (17·5%) or poultry (16·0%). The most common surveillance objectives were demonstrating freedom from disease (43·8%) and case detection (26·8%). Over half of components applied risk-based sampling (57·1%), but mainly focused on a single population stratum (targeted risk-based) rather than differentiating between risk levels of different strata (stratified risk-based). About a third of components were multi-hazard (37·3%). Both risk-based sampling and multi-hazard surveillance were used more frequently in privately funded components. The study identified several gaps (e.g. lack of systematic documentation, inconsistent application of terminology) and opportunities (e.g. stratified risk-based sampling). The greater flexibility provided by the new EU Animal Health Law means that systematic evaluation of surveillance alternatives will be required to optimize cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EU Animal Health Law; One Health; RISKSUR; risk-based; surveillance component

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27938416      PMCID: PMC9507724          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816002697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   4.434


  36 in total

1.  Implementing a probabilistic definition of freedom from infection to facilitate trade of livestock: putting theory into praxis for the example of bovine herpes virus-1.

Authors:  M E Schuppers; J A Stegeman; J A Kramps; K D C Stärk
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Policy-driven development of cost-effective, risk-based surveillance strategies.

Authors:  M Reist; T Jemmi; K D C Stärk
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 3.  Proposed terms and concepts for describing and evaluating animal-health surveillance systems.

Authors:  L J Hoinville; L Alban; J A Drewe; J C Gibbens; L Gustafson; B Häsler; C Saegerman; M Salman; K D C Stärk
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  Bluetongue surveillance system in Belgium: a stochastic evaluation of its risk-based approach effectiveness.

Authors:  Sarah Welby; Estelle Méroc; Christel Faes; Kris De Clercq; Jozef Hooyberghs; Koen Mintiens; Yves Van der Stede
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 5.  Veterinary syndromic surveillance: Current initiatives and potential for development.

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Javier Sanchez; Crawford W Revie
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Towards a standardised surveillance for Trichinella in the European Union.

Authors:  L Alban; E Pozio; J Boes; P Boireau; F Boué; M Claes; A J C Cook; P Dorny; H L Enemark; J van der Giessen; K R Hunt; M Howell; M Kirjusina; K Nöckler; P Rossi; G C Smith; L Snow; M A Taylor; G Theodoropoulos; I Vallée; M M Viera-Pinto; I A Zimmer
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Assessment of different surveillance systems for avian influenza in commercial poultry in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain).

Authors:  A Alba; J Casal; S Napp; P A J Martin
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Surveillance system sensitivities and probability of freedom from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in Swedish cattle.

Authors:  Jenny Frössling; Helene Wahlström; Estelle Carina Constance Agren; Angus Cameron; Ann Lindberg; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Current value of historical and ongoing surveillance for disease freedom: surveillance for bovine Johne's disease in Western Australia.

Authors:  P A J Martin
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  One Health surveillance - More than a buzz word?

Authors:  Katharina D C Stärk; Montserrat Arroyo Kuribreña; Gwenaelle Dauphin; Sandra Vokaty; Michael P Ward; Barbara Wieland; Ann Lindberg
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  8 in total

1.  Overview of Control Programs for Twenty-Four Infectious Cattle Diseases in Italy

Authors:  Marco Tamba; Ivana Pallante; Stefano Petrini; Francesco Feliziani; Carmen Iscaro; Norma Arrigoni; Daria Di Sabatino; Antonio Barberio; Veronica Cibin; Annalisa Santi; Marco Ianniello; Luigi Ruocco; Nicola Pozzato
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-26

2.  Information management and ante-mortem inspection procedures for the emerging diseases control: Experiences acquired in the epidemiological surveillance of bluetongue and lumpy skin disease.

Authors:  Alessandra Corradini; Marcello Trevisani; Geremia Dosa; Anna Padovani
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2018-03-31

Review 3.  The use of animals as a surveillance tool for monitoring environmental health hazards, human health hazards and bioterrorism.

Authors:  Jacqueline Pei Shan Neo; Boon Huan Tan
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Improving the Utility of Voluntary Ovine Fallen Stock Collection and Laboratory Diagnostic Submission Data for Animal Health Surveillance Purposes: A Development Cycle.

Authors:  Sue C Tongue; Jude I Eze; Carla Correia-Gomes; Franz Brülisauer; George J Gunn
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 5.  Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses at the Wild-Domestic Bird Interface in Europe: Future Directions for Research and Surveillance.

Authors:  Josanne H Verhagen; Ron A M Fouchier; Nicola Lewis
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Potential and Challenges of Community-Based Surveillance in Animal Health: A Pilot Study Among Equine Owners in Switzerland.

Authors:  Ranya Özçelik; Franziska Remy-Wohlfender; Susanne Küker; Vivianne Visschers; Daniela Hadorn; Salome Dürr
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-04

7.  Assessing the Adoption of Recommended Standards, Novel Approaches, and Best Practices for Animal Health Surveillance by Decision Makers in Europe.

Authors:  Barbara Häsler; Maria Garza; Betty Bisdorff; Anaïs Léger; Saraya Tavornpanich; Marisa Peyre; Ann Lindberg; Gerdien van Schaik; Lis Alban; Katharina D C Stärk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

8.  An index for multidimensional assessment of swine health.

Authors:  Aidé Zavala-Cortés; Gerardo Hernández; José-Víctor Calderón-Salinas
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.893

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.