Literature DB >> 15891452

Radiation biology: concepts for radiation protection.

R Julian Preston1.   

Abstract

The opportunity to write a historical review of the field of radiation biology allows for the viewing of the development and maturity of a field of study, thereby being able to provide the appropriate context for the earlier years of research and its findings. The pioneering work of Muller, Sax, and McClintock, and many others, has stood the test of time. The idea that x-rays could damage the genetic material and result in interactions that could lead to gene mutations and a range of chromosomal alterations is now interpretable in terms of induced DNA damage and errors of DNA repair. The expanded idea that such genetic alterations can be induced by DNA damage that is produced by one or two tracks of ionizing radiation remains the mainstay of radiation biology. The impact of the more recent molecular approaches to unraveling the mechanism behind this simple concept has confirmed this fundamental observation. The remarkable advances have allowed for a fairly complete understanding of the specific types of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiations and the pivotal role played by the errors of repair of double-strand breaks. Given our considerably enhanced knowledge of the details of the DNA repair processes involved, misrepair is a very unlikely event. The role of potential confounders of the concept of dose-response (e.g., bystander effects, genomic instability, and adaptive responses) is taking on a growing importance to the field. The evolving need is to begin to consider mechanistically-based dose-response models for cancer risk such that any potential impact of confounders on the response at low, environmental doses can be assessed. Thus, radiation biology research has always had a focus on how best to protect human health from radiation exposures and will continue to do so.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891452     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200506000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  13 in total

1.  An ultrasoft X-ray multi-microbeam irradiation system for studies of DNA damage responses by fixed- and live-cell fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Carel van Oven; Przemek M Krawczyk; Jan Stap; Arline M Melo; Maria H O Piazzetta; Angelo L Gobbi; Henk A van Veen; Jan Verhoeven; Jacob A Aten
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 2.  MicroRNAs in lung cancer.

Authors:  Pooja Joshi; Justin Middleton; Young-Jun Jeon; Michela Garofalo
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Modeling Dose-response at Low Dose: A Systems Biology Approach for Ionization Radiation.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; Paolo F Ricci
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  miR-9 and let-7g enhance the sensitivity to ionizing radiation by suppression of NFκB1.

Authors:  Himanshu Arora; Rehana Qureshi; Shunzi Jin; Ae Kyoung Park; Woong Yang Park
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 8.718

5.  Telomeric DNA induces p53-dependent reactive oxygen species and protects against oxidative damage.

Authors:  Margaret S Lee; Mina Yaar; Mark S Eller; Thomas M Rünger; Ying Gao; Barbara A Gilchrest
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.563

6.  Awareness and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation Risks Between Prescribed and Self-Presenting Patients for Common Diagnostic Radiological Procedures in Bahrain.

Authors:  Adel Al-Mallah; Asokan G Vaithinathan; Mahdi Al-Sehlawi; Mariam Al-Mannai
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-09

7.  Investigation of the interaction between the MIR-503 and CD40 genes in irradiated U937 cells.

Authors:  Guanghui Cheng; Shilong Sun; Zhanfeng Wang; Shunzi Jin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A new angiographic imaging platform reduces radiation exposure for patients with liver cancer treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Ruediger E Schernthaner; Rafael Duran; Julius Chapiro; Zhijun Wang; Jean-François H Geschwind; MingDe Lin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Is the Linear No-Threshold Dose-Response Paradigm Still Necessary for the Assessment of Health Effects of Low Dose Radiation?

Authors:  Ki Moon Seong; Songwon Seo; Dalnim Lee; Min-Jeong Kim; Seung-Sook Lee; Sunhoo Park; Young Woo Jin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Human embryonic stem cell responses to ionizing radiation exposures: current state of knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.